Abstract
This article suggests the High Court's current interpretation of s51(1) is too narrow. Specifically, it excludes production and manufacture from the concept, limiting the Commonwealth's practical ability to regulate business under this head of power. The article considers how the commerce clause has been interpreted in the United States, and that this should provide a guide to a broader interpretation of the head, as occurred previously.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 29-46 |
Number of pages | 18 |
Journal | Australian Business Law Review |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Externally published | Yes |