Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation: Consequences for information systems research

Dirk S. Hovorka, Allen S. Lee

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research offers a new perspective by reframing the positivist-interpretive debate as a distinction between the functional outcomes of research: explanation and understanding. Based on an older and well-established literature in philosophy, this distinction can reinvigorate important differences in research outcomes that have been lost. Understanding or "subjective meaning" is connected to the intentionality, thoughts, and motivations of the human subjects under study. From this perspective, understanding is the type of knowledge gained from determining the meanings, categories, and symbols humans attach to actions, knowledge, and systems. In contrast, explanation is achieved by subsuming individual instantiations of the phenomenon under broad general laws, or identifying causal mechanisms that support antecedent-consequent pairs. Researchers can proactively use the understanding-explanation distinction as a heuristic to create new lines of research questions based on what has not been explained or understood rather than on which ontology or methodology has not been used.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationICIS 2010 Proceedings
Subtitle of host publicationThirty First International Conference on Information Systems
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Event31st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2010 - Saint Louis, MO, United States
Duration: 12 Dec 201015 Dec 2010
Conference number: 31st

Conference

Conference31st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2010
Abbreviated titleICIS 2010
CountryUnited States
CitySaint Louis, MO
Period12/12/1015/12/10

Fingerprint

Information systems
Ontology

Cite this

Hovorka, D. S., & Lee, A. S. (2010). Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation: Consequences for information systems research. In ICIS 2010 Proceedings : Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems
Hovorka, Dirk S. ; Lee, Allen S. / Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation : Consequences for information systems research. ICIS 2010 Proceedings : Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems. 2010.
@inproceedings{037e8610ef2d497090dcbba2c4f6d488,
title = "Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation: Consequences for information systems research",
abstract = "This research offers a new perspective by reframing the positivist-interpretive debate as a distinction between the functional outcomes of research: explanation and understanding. Based on an older and well-established literature in philosophy, this distinction can reinvigorate important differences in research outcomes that have been lost. Understanding or {"}subjective meaning{"} is connected to the intentionality, thoughts, and motivations of the human subjects under study. From this perspective, understanding is the type of knowledge gained from determining the meanings, categories, and symbols humans attach to actions, knowledge, and systems. In contrast, explanation is achieved by subsuming individual instantiations of the phenomenon under broad general laws, or identifying causal mechanisms that support antecedent-consequent pairs. Researchers can proactively use the understanding-explanation distinction as a heuristic to create new lines of research questions based on what has not been explained or understood rather than on which ontology or methodology has not been used.",
author = "Hovorka, {Dirk S.} and Lee, {Allen S.}",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780615418988",
booktitle = "ICIS 2010 Proceedings",

}

Hovorka, DS & Lee, AS 2010, Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation: Consequences for information systems research. in ICIS 2010 Proceedings : Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems. 31st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2010, Saint Louis, MO, United States, 12/12/10.

Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation : Consequences for information systems research. / Hovorka, Dirk S.; Lee, Allen S.

ICIS 2010 Proceedings : Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems. 2010.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation

T2 - Consequences for information systems research

AU - Hovorka, Dirk S.

AU - Lee, Allen S.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - This research offers a new perspective by reframing the positivist-interpretive debate as a distinction between the functional outcomes of research: explanation and understanding. Based on an older and well-established literature in philosophy, this distinction can reinvigorate important differences in research outcomes that have been lost. Understanding or "subjective meaning" is connected to the intentionality, thoughts, and motivations of the human subjects under study. From this perspective, understanding is the type of knowledge gained from determining the meanings, categories, and symbols humans attach to actions, knowledge, and systems. In contrast, explanation is achieved by subsuming individual instantiations of the phenomenon under broad general laws, or identifying causal mechanisms that support antecedent-consequent pairs. Researchers can proactively use the understanding-explanation distinction as a heuristic to create new lines of research questions based on what has not been explained or understood rather than on which ontology or methodology has not been used.

AB - This research offers a new perspective by reframing the positivist-interpretive debate as a distinction between the functional outcomes of research: explanation and understanding. Based on an older and well-established literature in philosophy, this distinction can reinvigorate important differences in research outcomes that have been lost. Understanding or "subjective meaning" is connected to the intentionality, thoughts, and motivations of the human subjects under study. From this perspective, understanding is the type of knowledge gained from determining the meanings, categories, and symbols humans attach to actions, knowledge, and systems. In contrast, explanation is achieved by subsuming individual instantiations of the phenomenon under broad general laws, or identifying causal mechanisms that support antecedent-consequent pairs. Researchers can proactively use the understanding-explanation distinction as a heuristic to create new lines of research questions based on what has not been explained or understood rather than on which ontology or methodology has not been used.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870964069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Conference contribution

SN - 9780615418988

BT - ICIS 2010 Proceedings

ER -

Hovorka DS, Lee AS. Reframing interpretivism and positivism as understanding and explanation: Consequences for information systems research. In ICIS 2010 Proceedings : Thirty First International Conference on Information Systems. 2010