Abstract
Expanding disease definitions are causing more and more previously healthy people to be labelled as diseased, contributing to the problem of overdiagnosis and related overtreatment. Often the specialist guideline panels which expand definitions have close tis to industry and do not investigate the harms of defining more people as sick. Responding to growing calls to address these problems, an international group of leading researchers and clinicians is proposing a new way to set diagnostic thresholds and mark the boundaries of condition definitions, to try to tackle a key driver of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. The group proposes new evidence-informed principles, with new process and new people constituting new multi-disciplinary panels, free from financial conflicts of interest.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 170-173 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 8 Apr 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2019 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reforming disease definitions: A new primary care led, people-centred approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver