Reef’s standing threatened by governance?

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The status of the Great Barrier Reef may shift to a World Heritage site ‘in danger’ under the latest UNESCO Report issued on 1 June 2012. The Report requires Australia to take action by February 2013 to demonstrate its commitment to conserving the Reef.

In addition to what may be considered more ‘downstream’ concerns generated from Gladstone Harbour operations and the Curtis Island LNG plant, other events this month highlight that there are other direct threats to the Reef. In the third incident in a month, bulk carrier ID Integrity lost power off the far north Queensland coast, and drifted close to Shark Reef. While this incident ended well for the Reef, it has renewed calls for a review of shipping routes.

The government has reacted strongly, indicating that economic factors — particularly the economic benefits that flow from mining and shipping — will guide its regulatory response ahead of environmental concerns.

At law, the Reef exists at the intersection of regional, state, national and international jurisdictions. Particularly to the extent that this implies international involvement (through UNESCO) such joint management should represent an inclusive system of governance — the ‘intentional shaping of the flow of events so as to realize desired public good’ where the public good is environmental sustainability, economic wellbeing and social sustainability.

Instead, it appears that the Reef and its governance are now at a ‘crossroads’ and the legal framework surrounding effective protection of the Reef is driven by competing economic, ecological and political concerns.

Obviously the Australian government’s action over the coming months will inform UNESCO’s ultimate finding on the Reef’s status. Queensland’s approach will weigh heavily on the outcome. Without a holistic approach to mechanisms of governance and the range of threats to the Reef, Australia’s capacity to deliver will be compromised.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)209
Number of pages1
JournalAlternative Law Journal
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

UNESCO
governance
shipping
incident
sustainability
threat
economics
event
holistic approach
harbor
economic factors
integrity
jurisdiction
commitment
Law
management

Cite this

@article{62c9644e2a0b41098a96f45d0cf1c536,
title = "Reef’s standing threatened by governance?",
abstract = "The status of the Great Barrier Reef may shift to a World Heritage site ‘in danger’ under the latest UNESCO Report issued on 1 June 2012. The Report requires Australia to take action by February 2013 to demonstrate its commitment to conserving the Reef.In addition to what may be considered more ‘downstream’ concerns generated from Gladstone Harbour operations and the Curtis Island LNG plant, other events this month highlight that there are other direct threats to the Reef. In the third incident in a month, bulk carrier ID Integrity lost power off the far north Queensland coast, and drifted close to Shark Reef. While this incident ended well for the Reef, it has renewed calls for a review of shipping routes.The government has reacted strongly, indicating that economic factors — particularly the economic benefits that flow from mining and shipping — will guide its regulatory response ahead of environmental concerns.At law, the Reef exists at the intersection of regional, state, national and international jurisdictions. Particularly to the extent that this implies international involvement (through UNESCO) such joint management should represent an inclusive system of governance — the ‘intentional shaping of the flow of events so as to realize desired public good’ where the public good is environmental sustainability, economic wellbeing and social sustainability.Instead, it appears that the Reef and its governance are now at a ‘crossroads’ and the legal framework surrounding effective protection of the Reef is driven by competing economic, ecological and political concerns.Obviously the Australian government’s action over the coming months will inform UNESCO’s ultimate finding on the Reef’s status. Queensland’s approach will weigh heavily on the outcome. Without a holistic approach to mechanisms of governance and the range of threats to the Reef, Australia’s capacity to deliver will be compromised.",
author = "Kathrine Galloway",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1177/1037969X1203700317",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "209",
journal = "Alternative Law Journal",
issn = "1037-969X",
publisher = "Legal Service Bulletin Co-operative Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Reef’s standing threatened by governance? / Galloway, Kathrine.

In: Alternative Law Journal, Vol. 37, No. 3, 2012, p. 209.

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reef’s standing threatened by governance?

AU - Galloway, Kathrine

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The status of the Great Barrier Reef may shift to a World Heritage site ‘in danger’ under the latest UNESCO Report issued on 1 June 2012. The Report requires Australia to take action by February 2013 to demonstrate its commitment to conserving the Reef.In addition to what may be considered more ‘downstream’ concerns generated from Gladstone Harbour operations and the Curtis Island LNG plant, other events this month highlight that there are other direct threats to the Reef. In the third incident in a month, bulk carrier ID Integrity lost power off the far north Queensland coast, and drifted close to Shark Reef. While this incident ended well for the Reef, it has renewed calls for a review of shipping routes.The government has reacted strongly, indicating that economic factors — particularly the economic benefits that flow from mining and shipping — will guide its regulatory response ahead of environmental concerns.At law, the Reef exists at the intersection of regional, state, national and international jurisdictions. Particularly to the extent that this implies international involvement (through UNESCO) such joint management should represent an inclusive system of governance — the ‘intentional shaping of the flow of events so as to realize desired public good’ where the public good is environmental sustainability, economic wellbeing and social sustainability.Instead, it appears that the Reef and its governance are now at a ‘crossroads’ and the legal framework surrounding effective protection of the Reef is driven by competing economic, ecological and political concerns.Obviously the Australian government’s action over the coming months will inform UNESCO’s ultimate finding on the Reef’s status. Queensland’s approach will weigh heavily on the outcome. Without a holistic approach to mechanisms of governance and the range of threats to the Reef, Australia’s capacity to deliver will be compromised.

AB - The status of the Great Barrier Reef may shift to a World Heritage site ‘in danger’ under the latest UNESCO Report issued on 1 June 2012. The Report requires Australia to take action by February 2013 to demonstrate its commitment to conserving the Reef.In addition to what may be considered more ‘downstream’ concerns generated from Gladstone Harbour operations and the Curtis Island LNG plant, other events this month highlight that there are other direct threats to the Reef. In the third incident in a month, bulk carrier ID Integrity lost power off the far north Queensland coast, and drifted close to Shark Reef. While this incident ended well for the Reef, it has renewed calls for a review of shipping routes.The government has reacted strongly, indicating that economic factors — particularly the economic benefits that flow from mining and shipping — will guide its regulatory response ahead of environmental concerns.At law, the Reef exists at the intersection of regional, state, national and international jurisdictions. Particularly to the extent that this implies international involvement (through UNESCO) such joint management should represent an inclusive system of governance — the ‘intentional shaping of the flow of events so as to realize desired public good’ where the public good is environmental sustainability, economic wellbeing and social sustainability.Instead, it appears that the Reef and its governance are now at a ‘crossroads’ and the legal framework surrounding effective protection of the Reef is driven by competing economic, ecological and political concerns.Obviously the Australian government’s action over the coming months will inform UNESCO’s ultimate finding on the Reef’s status. Queensland’s approach will weigh heavily on the outcome. Without a holistic approach to mechanisms of governance and the range of threats to the Reef, Australia’s capacity to deliver will be compromised.

U2 - 10.1177/1037969X1203700317

DO - 10.1177/1037969X1203700317

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 37

SP - 209

JO - Alternative Law Journal

JF - Alternative Law Journal

SN - 1037-969X

IS - 3

ER -