Reconsidering pro bono: A comparative analysis of protocols in Australia, the united states, the United Kingdom and Singapore: A comparative analysis of protocols in Australia, the united states, the United Kingdom and Singapore

Rowena Maquire, Gail Shearer, Rachael Field

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

As of now, there is little evidence on the questions of whether pro bono services are effective, whether lawyer charity is a cheaper way to provide them (because it does cost money to do pro bono), or whether it would in fact be more efficient and effective if firms and attorneys stopped giving their time and instead donated money to the organizations already specializing in these clients and causes. Pro bono may or may not be an efficient way of doing socially important work; at this point, we simply do not know.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1164-1197
Number of pages34
JournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
Volume37
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering pro bono: A comparative analysis of protocols in Australia, the united states, the United Kingdom and Singapore: A comparative analysis of protocols in Australia, the united states, the United Kingdom and Singapore'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this