Reconciling cost-benefit and economic impact assessment for event tourism

B. Burgan, T. Mules

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Governments frequently justify their expenditure on underwriting the commercial viability of tourism events in terms of the economic impacts that the events bring to their host region. However, the justification for public expenditure in general is more usually based upon cost-benefit analysis, founded on the principles of welfare economics. It concentrates on consumer and producer surplus measures, with a particular emphasis on consumer surplus. In many cases the focus of special events is not on local consumers, but on attracting consumers from outside the region. In this case, producer surplus is the more appropriate focus. It generally assumes that resources are used at their opportunity cost. In contrast, economic impact analysis involves estimating the full value associated with the use of either labour or capital. This paper demonstrates that there is a potential correspondence between the welfare economics paradigm of cost-benefit analysis and the growth-based paradigm of economic impact. That link is based on an underlying presumption that resources are unused or underused, and therefore income generation is a real benefit.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)321-330
Number of pages10
JournalTourism Economics
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

economic impact
welfare economics
tourism
Tourism
cost-benefit analysis
event
costs
producer
resource
paradigm
impact analysis
expenditure
public expenditures
opportunity costs
viability
labor
resources
income
expenditures
cost

Cite this

@article{990a90c8abda4cbdbe0e12b7e50c0489,
title = "Reconciling cost-benefit and economic impact assessment for event tourism",
abstract = "Governments frequently justify their expenditure on underwriting the commercial viability of tourism events in terms of the economic impacts that the events bring to their host region. However, the justification for public expenditure in general is more usually based upon cost-benefit analysis, founded on the principles of welfare economics. It concentrates on consumer and producer surplus measures, with a particular emphasis on consumer surplus. In many cases the focus of special events is not on local consumers, but on attracting consumers from outside the region. In this case, producer surplus is the more appropriate focus. It generally assumes that resources are used at their opportunity cost. In contrast, economic impact analysis involves estimating the full value associated with the use of either labour or capital. This paper demonstrates that there is a potential correspondence between the welfare economics paradigm of cost-benefit analysis and the growth-based paradigm of economic impact. That link is based on an underlying presumption that resources are unused or underused, and therefore income generation is a real benefit.",
author = "B. Burgan and T. Mules",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.5367/000000001101297892",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "321--330",
journal = "Tourism Economics",
issn = "1354-8166",
publisher = "IP Publishing Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Reconciling cost-benefit and economic impact assessment for event tourism. / Burgan, B.; Mules, T.

In: Tourism Economics, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2001, p. 321-330.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconciling cost-benefit and economic impact assessment for event tourism

AU - Burgan, B.

AU - Mules, T.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Governments frequently justify their expenditure on underwriting the commercial viability of tourism events in terms of the economic impacts that the events bring to their host region. However, the justification for public expenditure in general is more usually based upon cost-benefit analysis, founded on the principles of welfare economics. It concentrates on consumer and producer surplus measures, with a particular emphasis on consumer surplus. In many cases the focus of special events is not on local consumers, but on attracting consumers from outside the region. In this case, producer surplus is the more appropriate focus. It generally assumes that resources are used at their opportunity cost. In contrast, economic impact analysis involves estimating the full value associated with the use of either labour or capital. This paper demonstrates that there is a potential correspondence between the welfare economics paradigm of cost-benefit analysis and the growth-based paradigm of economic impact. That link is based on an underlying presumption that resources are unused or underused, and therefore income generation is a real benefit.

AB - Governments frequently justify their expenditure on underwriting the commercial viability of tourism events in terms of the economic impacts that the events bring to their host region. However, the justification for public expenditure in general is more usually based upon cost-benefit analysis, founded on the principles of welfare economics. It concentrates on consumer and producer surplus measures, with a particular emphasis on consumer surplus. In many cases the focus of special events is not on local consumers, but on attracting consumers from outside the region. In this case, producer surplus is the more appropriate focus. It generally assumes that resources are used at their opportunity cost. In contrast, economic impact analysis involves estimating the full value associated with the use of either labour or capital. This paper demonstrates that there is a potential correspondence between the welfare economics paradigm of cost-benefit analysis and the growth-based paradigm of economic impact. That link is based on an underlying presumption that resources are unused or underused, and therefore income generation is a real benefit.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035210699&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5367/000000001101297892

DO - 10.5367/000000001101297892

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 321

EP - 330

JO - Tourism Economics

JF - Tourism Economics

SN - 1354-8166

IS - 4

ER -