Rationalities that underpin employability provision in higher education across eight countries

T. J. Hooley, Dawn Bennett, E. B. Knight

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)
    79 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article explores the rationalities advanced by 18 higher education institutions, located across eight countries, for developing and delivering employability provision. The article uses Sultana’s Habermasian-derived framework to categorise rationalities as either technocratic, humanistic or emancipatory. Based on a series of semi-structured dialogic interviews, the article explores how key strategic and operational personnel within higher education institutions articulate their rationality for engaging with employability. It finds that the rationalities advanced to support employability within different institutions vary through a conversation between institutional culture and priorities and the demands of different stakeholders who the institution seeks to engage. The technocratic and humanistic rationalities dominate, with the emancipatory rationality weakly represented in the data. However, in many cases, the different rationalities are woven together, often for tactical reasons, to create bespoke institutional rationalities.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalHigher Education
    DOIs
    Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 18 Nov 2022

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Rationalities that underpin employability provision in higher education across eight countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this