Radicalising Hayekian constitutionalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The work of Friedrich A Hayek presents a compelling theory of the normative basis for constitutionalism and other related notions, such as the rule of law. Suri Ratnapala has undertaken much valuable work on Hayekian constitutionalism and its application to specific questions of constitutional design.1 I am privileged to have been his collaborator in applying Hayekian ideas to the Australian constitutional system.2 It is difficult, however, to avoid a sense of incongruity when seeking to apply Hayekian notions within the context of the modern administrative state. Hayek is widely regarded as a conservative figure, although he famously rejected the label.3 A comparison between Hayek’s theory and modern modes of governance makes Hayek seem more radical than conservative, since deep reforms would be needed to instantiate anything like his preferred model. How radical, then, is Hayekian constitutionalism? That is the question I wish to explore in this article.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)379-389
Number of pages11
JournalUniversity of Queensland Law Journal
Volume33
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
constitutional state
governance
reform

Cite this

@article{4d8fa7ddd49147039df4ae2f752f3e43,
title = "Radicalising Hayekian constitutionalism",
abstract = "The work of Friedrich A Hayek presents a compelling theory of the normative basis for constitutionalism and other related notions, such as the rule of law. Suri Ratnapala has undertaken much valuable work on Hayekian constitutionalism and its application to specific questions of constitutional design.1 I am privileged to have been his collaborator in applying Hayekian ideas to the Australian constitutional system.2 It is difficult, however, to avoid a sense of incongruity when seeking to apply Hayekian notions within the context of the modern administrative state. Hayek is widely regarded as a conservative figure, although he famously rejected the label.3 A comparison between Hayek{\^a}€™s theory and modern modes of governance makes Hayek seem more radical than conservative, since deep reforms would be needed to instantiate anything like his preferred model. How radical, then, is Hayekian constitutionalism? That is the question I wish to explore in this article.",
author = "Jonathan Crowe",
year = "2014",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "379--389",
journal = "University of Queensland Law Journal",
issn = "0083-4041",
publisher = "University of Queensland Press",
number = "2",

}

Radicalising Hayekian constitutionalism. / Crowe, Jonathan.

In: University of Queensland Law Journal, Vol. 33, No. 2, 2014, p. 379-389.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radicalising Hayekian constitutionalism

AU - Crowe, Jonathan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The work of Friedrich A Hayek presents a compelling theory of the normative basis for constitutionalism and other related notions, such as the rule of law. Suri Ratnapala has undertaken much valuable work on Hayekian constitutionalism and its application to specific questions of constitutional design.1 I am privileged to have been his collaborator in applying Hayekian ideas to the Australian constitutional system.2 It is difficult, however, to avoid a sense of incongruity when seeking to apply Hayekian notions within the context of the modern administrative state. Hayek is widely regarded as a conservative figure, although he famously rejected the label.3 A comparison between Hayek’s theory and modern modes of governance makes Hayek seem more radical than conservative, since deep reforms would be needed to instantiate anything like his preferred model. How radical, then, is Hayekian constitutionalism? That is the question I wish to explore in this article.

AB - The work of Friedrich A Hayek presents a compelling theory of the normative basis for constitutionalism and other related notions, such as the rule of law. Suri Ratnapala has undertaken much valuable work on Hayekian constitutionalism and its application to specific questions of constitutional design.1 I am privileged to have been his collaborator in applying Hayekian ideas to the Australian constitutional system.2 It is difficult, however, to avoid a sense of incongruity when seeking to apply Hayekian notions within the context of the modern administrative state. Hayek is widely regarded as a conservative figure, although he famously rejected the label.3 A comparison between Hayek’s theory and modern modes of governance makes Hayek seem more radical than conservative, since deep reforms would be needed to instantiate anything like his preferred model. How radical, then, is Hayekian constitutionalism? That is the question I wish to explore in this article.

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 379

EP - 389

JO - University of Queensland Law Journal

JF - University of Queensland Law Journal

SN - 0083-4041

IS - 2

ER -