Abstract
This paper considers s18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), commonly known as the anti-religious vilification law. Though the section may have laudable aims, it captures a broad range of speech, including speech that is 'offensive'. There is serious doubt as to whether legislation of this kind will achieve its objectives, and it may have a significant chilling effect on speech. It may be constitutionally invalid, given its impact on the implied freedom of political communication. The paper considers how such speech has been regulated elsewhere.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 167-195 |
| Number of pages | 29 |
| Journal | Common Law World Review |
| Volume | 41 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2012 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Racial Vilification and Freedom of Speech in Australia and Elsewhere'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver