Abstract
This paper considers s18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), commonly known as the anti-religious vilification law. Though the section may have laudable aims, it captures a broad range of speech, including speech that is 'offensive'. There is serious doubt as to whether legislation of this kind will achieve its objectives, and it may have a significant chilling effect on speech. It may be constitutionally invalid, given its impact on the implied freedom of political communication. The paper considers how such speech has been regulated elsewhere.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 167-195 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | Common Law World Review |
Volume | 41 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |