Quantum Meruit for services rendered in a three-party context: (Implied) contract, restitution, or unjust enrichment?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This article considers when a claimant is entitled to recover (on a quantum meruit) for services rendered to the recipient of the services, where such recipient (or the claimant) has a contractual relatinship with a third party governing the performance of the services. Such three-party scenarios pose challenges for unjust enrichment theory. An alternative analysis, adopted in a recent decision of the High Court of Australia, uses what is essentially contractual reasoning to establish a quantum meruit. This article considers the competing approaches and concludes that the contractual approach is simpler, and more accurately reflects the reality of the parties' relationships and the legal concerns that need to be addressed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)98-111
Number of pages14
JournalRestitution Law Review
Volume17
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

recipient
scenario
performance

Cite this

@article{0061e145412e4f20bf38251c1d67afe2,
title = "Quantum Meruit for services rendered in a three-party context: (Implied) contract, restitution, or unjust enrichment?",
abstract = "This article considers when a claimant is entitled to recover (on a quantum meruit) for services rendered to the recipient of the services, where such recipient (or the claimant) has a contractual relatinship with a third party governing the performance of the services. Such three-party scenarios pose challenges for unjust enrichment theory. An alternative analysis, adopted in a recent decision of the High Court of Australia, uses what is essentially contractual reasoning to establish a quantum meruit. This article considers the competing approaches and concludes that the contractual approach is simpler, and more accurately reflects the reality of the parties' relationships and the legal concerns that need to be addressed.",
author = "Joachim Dietrich",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "98--111",
journal = "Restitution Law Review",
issn = "1351-170X",

}

Quantum Meruit for services rendered in a three-party context: (Implied) contract, restitution, or unjust enrichment? / Dietrich, Joachim.

In: Restitution Law Review, Vol. 17, 2009, p. 98-111.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantum Meruit for services rendered in a three-party context: (Implied) contract, restitution, or unjust enrichment?

AU - Dietrich, Joachim

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - This article considers when a claimant is entitled to recover (on a quantum meruit) for services rendered to the recipient of the services, where such recipient (or the claimant) has a contractual relatinship with a third party governing the performance of the services. Such three-party scenarios pose challenges for unjust enrichment theory. An alternative analysis, adopted in a recent decision of the High Court of Australia, uses what is essentially contractual reasoning to establish a quantum meruit. This article considers the competing approaches and concludes that the contractual approach is simpler, and more accurately reflects the reality of the parties' relationships and the legal concerns that need to be addressed.

AB - This article considers when a claimant is entitled to recover (on a quantum meruit) for services rendered to the recipient of the services, where such recipient (or the claimant) has a contractual relatinship with a third party governing the performance of the services. Such three-party scenarios pose challenges for unjust enrichment theory. An alternative analysis, adopted in a recent decision of the High Court of Australia, uses what is essentially contractual reasoning to establish a quantum meruit. This article considers the competing approaches and concludes that the contractual approach is simpler, and more accurately reflects the reality of the parties' relationships and the legal concerns that need to be addressed.

UR - http://www.wildy.com/id/126382/restitution-law-review-volume-17-paperback-marenex-press

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 98

EP - 111

JO - Restitution Law Review

JF - Restitution Law Review

SN - 1351-170X

ER -