Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care: Their origins, spread, effectiveness and lacunae– A scoping review

Adrian Rohrbasser, Janet Harris, Sharon Mickan, Kali Tal, Geoff Wong

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Quality circles or peer review groups, and similar structured small groups of 6–12 health care professionals meet regularly across Europe to reflect on and improve their standard practice. There is debate over their effectiveness in primary health care, especially over their potential to change practitioners’ behaviour. Despite their popularity, we could not identify broad surveys of the literature on quality circles in a primary care context. Our scoping review was intended to identify possible definitions of quality circles, their origins, and reported effectiveness in primary health care, and to identify gaps in our knowledge. We searched appropriate databases and included any relevant paper on quality circles published until December 2017. We then compared information we found in the articles to that we found in books and on websites. Our search returned 7824 citations, from which we identified 82 background papers and 58 papers about quality circles. We found that they originated in manufacturing industry and that many countries adopted them for primary health care to continuously improve medical education, professional development, and quality of care. Quality circles are not standardized and their techniques are complex. We identified 19 papers that described individual studies, one paper that summarized 3 studies, and 1 systematic review that suggested that quality circles can effectively change behaviour, though effect sizes varied, depending on topic and context. Studies also suggested participation may affirm self-esteem and increase professional confidence. Because reports of the effect of quality circles on behaviour are variable, we recommend theory-driven research approaches to analyse and improve the effectiveness of this complex intervention.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0202616
JournalPLoS One
Volume13
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Management Quality Circles
Quality Improvement
Health care
health services
Primary Health Care
professional development
medical education
self-esteem
systematic review
behavior change
peers
Medical education
health care workers
Bioelectric potentials
manufacturing
industry
Websites
Peer Group
Peer Review
Quality of Health Care

Cite this

@article{f264a9d7aafe45309f3613a46db0c55e,
title = "Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care: Their origins, spread, effectiveness and lacunae– A scoping review",
abstract = "Quality circles or peer review groups, and similar structured small groups of 6–12 health care professionals meet regularly across Europe to reflect on and improve their standard practice. There is debate over their effectiveness in primary health care, especially over their potential to change practitioners’ behaviour. Despite their popularity, we could not identify broad surveys of the literature on quality circles in a primary care context. Our scoping review was intended to identify possible definitions of quality circles, their origins, and reported effectiveness in primary health care, and to identify gaps in our knowledge. We searched appropriate databases and included any relevant paper on quality circles published until December 2017. We then compared information we found in the articles to that we found in books and on websites. Our search returned 7824 citations, from which we identified 82 background papers and 58 papers about quality circles. We found that they originated in manufacturing industry and that many countries adopted them for primary health care to continuously improve medical education, professional development, and quality of care. Quality circles are not standardized and their techniques are complex. We identified 19 papers that described individual studies, one paper that summarized 3 studies, and 1 systematic review that suggested that quality circles can effectively change behaviour, though effect sizes varied, depending on topic and context. Studies also suggested participation may affirm self-esteem and increase professional confidence. Because reports of the effect of quality circles on behaviour are variable, we recommend theory-driven research approaches to analyse and improve the effectiveness of this complex intervention.",
author = "Adrian Rohrbasser and Janet Harris and Sharon Mickan and Kali Tal and Geoff Wong",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0202616",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "PLoS One",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "12",

}

Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care : Their origins, spread, effectiveness and lacunae– A scoping review. / Rohrbasser, Adrian; Harris, Janet; Mickan, Sharon; Tal, Kali; Wong, Geoff.

In: PLoS One, Vol. 13, No. 12, e0202616, 01.12.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality circles for quality improvement in primary health care

T2 - Their origins, spread, effectiveness and lacunae– A scoping review

AU - Rohrbasser, Adrian

AU - Harris, Janet

AU - Mickan, Sharon

AU - Tal, Kali

AU - Wong, Geoff

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Quality circles or peer review groups, and similar structured small groups of 6–12 health care professionals meet regularly across Europe to reflect on and improve their standard practice. There is debate over their effectiveness in primary health care, especially over their potential to change practitioners’ behaviour. Despite their popularity, we could not identify broad surveys of the literature on quality circles in a primary care context. Our scoping review was intended to identify possible definitions of quality circles, their origins, and reported effectiveness in primary health care, and to identify gaps in our knowledge. We searched appropriate databases and included any relevant paper on quality circles published until December 2017. We then compared information we found in the articles to that we found in books and on websites. Our search returned 7824 citations, from which we identified 82 background papers and 58 papers about quality circles. We found that they originated in manufacturing industry and that many countries adopted them for primary health care to continuously improve medical education, professional development, and quality of care. Quality circles are not standardized and their techniques are complex. We identified 19 papers that described individual studies, one paper that summarized 3 studies, and 1 systematic review that suggested that quality circles can effectively change behaviour, though effect sizes varied, depending on topic and context. Studies also suggested participation may affirm self-esteem and increase professional confidence. Because reports of the effect of quality circles on behaviour are variable, we recommend theory-driven research approaches to analyse and improve the effectiveness of this complex intervention.

AB - Quality circles or peer review groups, and similar structured small groups of 6–12 health care professionals meet regularly across Europe to reflect on and improve their standard practice. There is debate over their effectiveness in primary health care, especially over their potential to change practitioners’ behaviour. Despite their popularity, we could not identify broad surveys of the literature on quality circles in a primary care context. Our scoping review was intended to identify possible definitions of quality circles, their origins, and reported effectiveness in primary health care, and to identify gaps in our knowledge. We searched appropriate databases and included any relevant paper on quality circles published until December 2017. We then compared information we found in the articles to that we found in books and on websites. Our search returned 7824 citations, from which we identified 82 background papers and 58 papers about quality circles. We found that they originated in manufacturing industry and that many countries adopted them for primary health care to continuously improve medical education, professional development, and quality of care. Quality circles are not standardized and their techniques are complex. We identified 19 papers that described individual studies, one paper that summarized 3 studies, and 1 systematic review that suggested that quality circles can effectively change behaviour, though effect sizes varied, depending on topic and context. Studies also suggested participation may affirm self-esteem and increase professional confidence. Because reports of the effect of quality circles on behaviour are variable, we recommend theory-driven research approaches to analyse and improve the effectiveness of this complex intervention.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058503664&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202616

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0202616

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

JO - PLoS One

JF - PLoS One

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 12

M1 - e0202616

ER -