Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments

Anna Mae Scott, Björn Hofmann, Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Kristin Bakke Lysdahl, Lars Sandman, Yvonne Bombard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations' websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains - the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberDoc02
Number of pages9
JournalGMS Health Technology Assessment
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Biomedical Technology Assessment
Ethics
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Organizations
Education

Cite this

Scott, Anna Mae ; Hofmann, Björn ; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki ; Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin ; Sandman, Lars ; Bombard, Yvonne. / Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments. In: GMS Health Technology Assessment. 2017 ; Vol. 13.
@article{73c8289d0ced4daebe7aa188912596de,
title = "Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments",
abstract = "Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations' websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains - the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.",
author = "Scott, {Anna Mae} and Bj{\"o}rn Hofmann and I{\~n}aki Guti{\'e}rrez-Ibarluzea and {Bakke Lysdahl}, Kristin and Lars Sandman and Yvonne Bombard",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3205/hta000128",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
journal = "GMS Health Technology Assessment",
issn = "1861-8863",
publisher = "German Medical Science",

}

Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments. / Scott, Anna Mae; Hofmann, Björn; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki; Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin; Sandman, Lars; Bombard, Yvonne.

In: GMS Health Technology Assessment, Vol. 13, Doc02, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Q-SEA - a tool for quality assessment of ethics analyses conducted as part of health technology assessments

AU - Scott, Anna Mae

AU - Hofmann, Björn

AU - Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea, Iñaki

AU - Bakke Lysdahl, Kristin

AU - Sandman, Lars

AU - Bombard, Yvonne

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations' websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains - the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.

AB - Introduction: Assessment of ethics issues is an important part of health technology assessments (HTA). However, in terms of existence of quality assessment tools, ethics for HTA is methodologically underdeveloped in comparison to other areas of HTA, such as clinical or cost effectiveness. Objective: To methodologically advance ethics for HTA by: (1) proposing and elaborating Q-SEA, the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses, and (2) applying Q-SEA to a sample systematic review of ethics for HTA, in order to illustrate and facilitate its use. Methods: To develop a list of items for the Q-SEA instrument, we systematically reviewed the literature on methodology in ethics for HTA, reviewed HTA organizations' websites, and solicited views from 32 experts in the field of ethics for HTA at two 2-day workshops. We subsequently refined Q-SEA through its application to an ethics analysis conducted for HTA. Results: Q-SEA instrument consists of two domains - the process domain and the output domain. The process domain consists of 5 elements: research question, literature search, inclusion/exclusion criteria, perspective, and ethics framework. The output domain consists of 5 elements: completeness, bias, implications, conceptual clarification, and conflicting values. Conclusion: Q-SEA is the first instrument for quality assessment of ethics analyses in HTA. Further refinements to the instrument to enhance its usability continue.

U2 - 10.3205/hta000128

DO - 10.3205/hta000128

M3 - Article

VL - 13

JO - GMS Health Technology Assessment

JF - GMS Health Technology Assessment

SN - 1861-8863

M1 - Doc02

ER -