Pushing the envelope of proprietary interests: The nadir of the numerus clausus principle?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The numerus clausus principle is an inherent approach to the structure of property interests which is reflected in both the common and civil law and in both real and personal property. There are sound policy reasons for this approach based on economic and legal concepts. This conservative influence on property interests is increasingly being disrupted by the impact of judicial activism but more importantly by statutory property interests based upon social and environmental forces which seek to loosen the bonds of this principle. The advantages and criticisms of this principle are analysed in this article along with the potential risks of disrupting this fundamental meta-principle of property law.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)651-679
Number of pages29
JournalMelbourne University Law Review
Volume39
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

civil law
common law
criticism
Law
economics

Cite this

@article{d8de2c4afb86405a85f7fc1972e85a2d,
title = "Pushing the envelope of proprietary interests: The nadir of the numerus clausus principle?",
abstract = "The numerus clausus principle is an inherent approach to the structure of property interests which is reflected in both the common and civil law and in both real and personal property. There are sound policy reasons for this approach based on economic and legal concepts. This conservative influence on property interests is increasingly being disrupted by the impact of judicial activism but more importantly by statutory property interests based upon social and environmental forces which seek to loosen the bonds of this principle. The advantages and criticisms of this principle are analysed in this article along with the potential risks of disrupting this fundamental meta-principle of property law.",
author = "Michael Weir",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "651--679",
journal = "Melbourne University Law Review",
issn = "0025-8938",
publisher = "MELBOURNE UNIV LAW REVIEW ASSOC",
number = "2",

}

Pushing the envelope of proprietary interests : The nadir of the numerus clausus principle? / Weir, Michael.

In: Melbourne University Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 2, 2015, p. 651-679.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pushing the envelope of proprietary interests

T2 - The nadir of the numerus clausus principle?

AU - Weir, Michael

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - The numerus clausus principle is an inherent approach to the structure of property interests which is reflected in both the common and civil law and in both real and personal property. There are sound policy reasons for this approach based on economic and legal concepts. This conservative influence on property interests is increasingly being disrupted by the impact of judicial activism but more importantly by statutory property interests based upon social and environmental forces which seek to loosen the bonds of this principle. The advantages and criticisms of this principle are analysed in this article along with the potential risks of disrupting this fundamental meta-principle of property law.

AB - The numerus clausus principle is an inherent approach to the structure of property interests which is reflected in both the common and civil law and in both real and personal property. There are sound policy reasons for this approach based on economic and legal concepts. This conservative influence on property interests is increasingly being disrupted by the impact of judicial activism but more importantly by statutory property interests based upon social and environmental forces which seek to loosen the bonds of this principle. The advantages and criticisms of this principle are analysed in this article along with the potential risks of disrupting this fundamental meta-principle of property law.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963657411&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 39

SP - 651

EP - 679

JO - Melbourne University Law Review

JF - Melbourne University Law Review

SN - 0025-8938

IS - 2

ER -