Public infrastructure procurement

A review of adversarial and non-adversarial contracting methods

Michael Regan, Peter E D Love, Jim Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Adversarial contracting methods are used for most public infrastructure procurement and timely delivery on budget remains a problem. In the past 20 years, OECD countries have adopted a number of alternative procurement methods that are based on collaborative principles including public private partnerships, long-term outsourcing arrangements and relationship/alliance contracts. We review the theoretical principles that operate for both adversarial and collaborative contracting methods. We identify the characteristics of non-adversarial contracting methods such as the output specification, qualitative selection criteria, the alignment of incentives, discrete allocation of residual control rights, life cycle costing, and risk-weighted value for money measurement that are delivering better procurement outcomes for government.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-438
Number of pages34
JournalJournal of Public Procurement
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2015

Fingerprint

infrastructure
public private partnership
outsourcing
OECD
life cycle
budget
incentive

Cite this

@article{2d0df2414e574b8ca8560610b1c1d47c,
title = "Public infrastructure procurement: A review of adversarial and non-adversarial contracting methods",
abstract = "Adversarial contracting methods are used for most public infrastructure procurement and timely delivery on budget remains a problem. In the past 20 years, OECD countries have adopted a number of alternative procurement methods that are based on collaborative principles including public private partnerships, long-term outsourcing arrangements and relationship/alliance contracts. We review the theoretical principles that operate for both adversarial and collaborative contracting methods. We identify the characteristics of non-adversarial contracting methods such as the output specification, qualitative selection criteria, the alignment of incentives, discrete allocation of residual control rights, life cycle costing, and risk-weighted value for money measurement that are delivering better procurement outcomes for government.",
author = "Michael Regan and Love, {Peter E D} and Jim Smith",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1108/JOPP-15-04-2015-B001",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "405--438",
journal = "Journal of Public Procurement",
issn = "1535-0118",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

Public infrastructure procurement : A review of adversarial and non-adversarial contracting methods. / Regan, Michael; Love, Peter E D; Smith, Jim.

In: Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.12.2015, p. 405-438.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public infrastructure procurement

T2 - A review of adversarial and non-adversarial contracting methods

AU - Regan, Michael

AU - Love, Peter E D

AU - Smith, Jim

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Adversarial contracting methods are used for most public infrastructure procurement and timely delivery on budget remains a problem. In the past 20 years, OECD countries have adopted a number of alternative procurement methods that are based on collaborative principles including public private partnerships, long-term outsourcing arrangements and relationship/alliance contracts. We review the theoretical principles that operate for both adversarial and collaborative contracting methods. We identify the characteristics of non-adversarial contracting methods such as the output specification, qualitative selection criteria, the alignment of incentives, discrete allocation of residual control rights, life cycle costing, and risk-weighted value for money measurement that are delivering better procurement outcomes for government.

AB - Adversarial contracting methods are used for most public infrastructure procurement and timely delivery on budget remains a problem. In the past 20 years, OECD countries have adopted a number of alternative procurement methods that are based on collaborative principles including public private partnerships, long-term outsourcing arrangements and relationship/alliance contracts. We review the theoretical principles that operate for both adversarial and collaborative contracting methods. We identify the characteristics of non-adversarial contracting methods such as the output specification, qualitative selection criteria, the alignment of incentives, discrete allocation of residual control rights, life cycle costing, and risk-weighted value for money measurement that are delivering better procurement outcomes for government.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038564630&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/JOPP-15-04-2015-B001

DO - 10.1108/JOPP-15-04-2015-B001

M3 - Article

VL - 15

SP - 405

EP - 438

JO - Journal of Public Procurement

JF - Journal of Public Procurement

SN - 1535-0118

IS - 4

ER -