Public health marketing: Is it good and is it good for everyone?

Gordon Holden, Damian Cox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

22 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We define public health marketing broadly as the use of marketing tools (segmentation, targeting, position­ing, and the four Ps) to encourage behaviour change that will deliver the social good defined as public health. We explore the ethical challenges and risks that confront public health and social marketers. In particular, we note that public health marketers with a self-defined goal of delivering a social good face two major ethical challenges: the first is establishing the ethicality of the social good itself; the second is distributing the social good in an ethically defensible way. In particular, we draw attention to the central conflict of balancing the utilitarian benefits of public health with the rights and needs of individuals. This in turn leads to consideration of the issues of paternalism and the degree of influence that might be deemed appropriate for public health marketing.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-26
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Marketing
Volume52
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Public health marketing: Is it good and is it good for everyone?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this