Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients

Fact or fiction?

Christopher F. Sharpley*, Vicki Bitsika, David R H Christie

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

36 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although the detrimental effect upon psychological well-being of receiving a diagnosis of, or treatment for, cancer has been demonstrated across many different types of cancer, three recent reviews of the psychological health of prostate cancer patients have produced contradictory conclusions. In order to elucidate the reasons for these apparent different conclusions, each of these reviews is described, with principal methods and findings summarised. Actual data, methodology used to select/reject research studies for inclusion in reviews, plus the validity of strict methodological culling of some research studies are discussed. Several extra studies and commentaries are also described, and a resolution of the apparent contradictory review conclusions is offered.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)563-572
Number of pages10
JournalClinical Medicine: Oncology
Volume2
Publication statusPublished - 16 Dec 2008

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Psychology
Research
Neoplasms
Health
Therapeutics

Cite this

Sharpley, C. F., Bitsika, V., & Christie, D. R. H. (2008). Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients: Fact or fiction? Clinical Medicine: Oncology, 2, 563-572.
Sharpley, Christopher F. ; Bitsika, Vicki ; Christie, David R H. / Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients : Fact or fiction?. In: Clinical Medicine: Oncology. 2008 ; Vol. 2. pp. 563-572.
@article{7331e0cf232746f49f4ebd508036d990,
title = "Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients: Fact or fiction?",
abstract = "Although the detrimental effect upon psychological well-being of receiving a diagnosis of, or treatment for, cancer has been demonstrated across many different types of cancer, three recent reviews of the psychological health of prostate cancer patients have produced contradictory conclusions. In order to elucidate the reasons for these apparent different conclusions, each of these reviews is described, with principal methods and findings summarised. Actual data, methodology used to select/reject research studies for inclusion in reviews, plus the validity of strict methodological culling of some research studies are discussed. Several extra studies and commentaries are also described, and a resolution of the apparent contradictory review conclusions is offered.",
author = "Sharpley, {Christopher F.} and Vicki Bitsika and Christie, {David R H}",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "16",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "563--572",
journal = "Clinical Medicine: Oncology",
issn = "1177-9314",
publisher = "Libertas Academica Ltd.",

}

Sharpley, CF, Bitsika, V & Christie, DRH 2008, 'Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients: Fact or fiction?', Clinical Medicine: Oncology, vol. 2, pp. 563-572.

Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients : Fact or fiction? / Sharpley, Christopher F.; Bitsika, Vicki; Christie, David R H.

In: Clinical Medicine: Oncology, Vol. 2, 16.12.2008, p. 563-572.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological distress among prostate cancer patients

T2 - Fact or fiction?

AU - Sharpley, Christopher F.

AU - Bitsika, Vicki

AU - Christie, David R H

PY - 2008/12/16

Y1 - 2008/12/16

N2 - Although the detrimental effect upon psychological well-being of receiving a diagnosis of, or treatment for, cancer has been demonstrated across many different types of cancer, three recent reviews of the psychological health of prostate cancer patients have produced contradictory conclusions. In order to elucidate the reasons for these apparent different conclusions, each of these reviews is described, with principal methods and findings summarised. Actual data, methodology used to select/reject research studies for inclusion in reviews, plus the validity of strict methodological culling of some research studies are discussed. Several extra studies and commentaries are also described, and a resolution of the apparent contradictory review conclusions is offered.

AB - Although the detrimental effect upon psychological well-being of receiving a diagnosis of, or treatment for, cancer has been demonstrated across many different types of cancer, three recent reviews of the psychological health of prostate cancer patients have produced contradictory conclusions. In order to elucidate the reasons for these apparent different conclusions, each of these reviews is described, with principal methods and findings summarised. Actual data, methodology used to select/reject research studies for inclusion in reviews, plus the validity of strict methodological culling of some research studies are discussed. Several extra studies and commentaries are also described, and a resolution of the apparent contradictory review conclusions is offered.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72149105362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Review article

VL - 2

SP - 563

EP - 572

JO - Clinical Medicine: Oncology

JF - Clinical Medicine: Oncology

SN - 1177-9314

ER -