Psychological capital, employee engagement, and perceived performance in a multinational organisation

Richard E. Hicks, Eva-Maria Knies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Psychological capital (PsyCap: involving self-efficacy, optimism, hope and resilience) clearly contributes to organisational success, as indicated in western-based studies. But does psychological capital operate in a stable way across cultures? Few or no studies had addressed this issue. We were able to examine, in a multicultural industrial organisation (centred in Europe but with Asian and US regional centres), how psychological capital was related to workplace engagement and self-perceived quality of workplace performance across the organisation. A sample of 183 employees from the multinational organisation completed the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), a one-item self-perceived performance scale (on contribution made to the organisation) and a demographics questionnaire identifying position level held (manager, other) and other data. There were 55 employees from America, 69 from Europe and 59 from Asia. Strong similarities across the cultural groups were found when regression equations, controlling for position held, examined how well PsyCap predicted first, work engagement of individuals, and second, the employees’ perceived performance in contributing to the organisation. The results largely confirmed the stability of psychological capital and its effects, across regions, with HR implications for organisations with multinational operations. Limitations and future research directions are indicated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-177
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Business and Policy Research
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Employee engagement
Multinational organizations
Psychological capital
Employees
Questionnaire
Asia
Work engagement
Work place
Demographics
Research directions
Multinationals
Managers
Optimism
Perceived quality
Industrial organization
Self-efficacy
Resilience

Cite this

@article{6e74cec1fc8545729d8f8b61dd9c2f46,
title = "Psychological capital, employee engagement, and perceived performance in a multinational organisation",
abstract = "Psychological capital (PsyCap: involving self-efficacy, optimism, hope and resilience) clearly contributes to organisational success, as indicated in western-based studies. But does psychological capital operate in a stable way across cultures? Few or no studies had addressed this issue. We were able to examine, in a multicultural industrial organisation (centred in Europe but with Asian and US regional centres), how psychological capital was related to workplace engagement and self-perceived quality of workplace performance across the organisation. A sample of 183 employees from the multinational organisation completed the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), a one-item self-perceived performance scale (on contribution made to the organisation) and a demographics questionnaire identifying position level held (manager, other) and other data. There were 55 employees from America, 69 from Europe and 59 from Asia. Strong similarities across the cultural groups were found when regression equations, controlling for position held, examined how well PsyCap predicted first, work engagement of individuals, and second, the employees{\^a}€™ perceived performance in contributing to the organisation. The results largely confirmed the stability of psychological capital and its effects, across regions, with HR implications for organisations with multinational operations. Limitations and future research directions are indicated.",
author = "Hicks, {Richard E.} and Eva-Maria Knies",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.21102/jbpr.2015.07.101.09",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "164--177",
journal = "Journal of Business and Policy Research",
issn = "1449-387X",
number = "1",

}

Psychological capital, employee engagement, and perceived performance in a multinational organisation. / Hicks, Richard E.; Knies, Eva-Maria.

In: Journal of Business and Policy Research, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2015, p. 164-177.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychological capital, employee engagement, and perceived performance in a multinational organisation

AU - Hicks, Richard E.

AU - Knies, Eva-Maria

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Psychological capital (PsyCap: involving self-efficacy, optimism, hope and resilience) clearly contributes to organisational success, as indicated in western-based studies. But does psychological capital operate in a stable way across cultures? Few or no studies had addressed this issue. We were able to examine, in a multicultural industrial organisation (centred in Europe but with Asian and US regional centres), how psychological capital was related to workplace engagement and self-perceived quality of workplace performance across the organisation. A sample of 183 employees from the multinational organisation completed the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), a one-item self-perceived performance scale (on contribution made to the organisation) and a demographics questionnaire identifying position level held (manager, other) and other data. There were 55 employees from America, 69 from Europe and 59 from Asia. Strong similarities across the cultural groups were found when regression equations, controlling for position held, examined how well PsyCap predicted first, work engagement of individuals, and second, the employees’ perceived performance in contributing to the organisation. The results largely confirmed the stability of psychological capital and its effects, across regions, with HR implications for organisations with multinational operations. Limitations and future research directions are indicated.

AB - Psychological capital (PsyCap: involving self-efficacy, optimism, hope and resilience) clearly contributes to organisational success, as indicated in western-based studies. But does psychological capital operate in a stable way across cultures? Few or no studies had addressed this issue. We were able to examine, in a multicultural industrial organisation (centred in Europe but with Asian and US regional centres), how psychological capital was related to workplace engagement and self-perceived quality of workplace performance across the organisation. A sample of 183 employees from the multinational organisation completed the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), a one-item self-perceived performance scale (on contribution made to the organisation) and a demographics questionnaire identifying position level held (manager, other) and other data. There were 55 employees from America, 69 from Europe and 59 from Asia. Strong similarities across the cultural groups were found when regression equations, controlling for position held, examined how well PsyCap predicted first, work engagement of individuals, and second, the employees’ perceived performance in contributing to the organisation. The results largely confirmed the stability of psychological capital and its effects, across regions, with HR implications for organisations with multinational operations. Limitations and future research directions are indicated.

U2 - 10.21102/jbpr.2015.07.101.09

DO - 10.21102/jbpr.2015.07.101.09

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 164

EP - 177

JO - Journal of Business and Policy Research

JF - Journal of Business and Policy Research

SN - 1449-387X

IS - 1

ER -