Psychological capital, employee engagement, and perceived performance in a multinational organisation

Richard E. Hicks, Eva-Maria Knies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review


Psychological capital (PsyCap: involving self-efficacy, optimism, hope and resilience) clearly contributes to organisational success, as indicated in western-based studies. But does psychological capital operate in a stable way across cultures? Few or no studies had addressed this issue. We were able to examine, in a multicultural industrial organisation (centred in Europe but with Asian and US regional centres), how psychological capital was related to workplace engagement and self-perceived quality of workplace performance across the organisation. A sample of 183 employees from the multinational organisation completed the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES), a one-item self-perceived performance scale (on contribution made to the organisation) and a demographics questionnaire identifying position level held (manager, other) and other data. There were 55 employees from America, 69 from Europe and 59 from Asia. Strong similarities across the cultural groups were found when regression equations, controlling for position held, examined how well PsyCap predicted first, work engagement of individuals, and second, the employees’ perceived performance in contributing to the organisation. The results largely confirmed the stability of psychological capital and its effects, across regions, with HR implications for organisations with multinational operations. Limitations and future research directions are indicated.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)164-177
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Business and Policy Research
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological capital, employee engagement, and perceived performance in a multinational organisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this