Abstract
What we did:
• We examined if psychological and social factors
influenced choice of sleeve (more invasive LSG
vs less invasive ESG).
• 25 LSG and 25 ESG patients in Queensland,
Australia, were matched for age, sex, and BMI.
They had no significant differences in
demographics, comorbidities, nor body
composition.
• Pre-procedure weight-related psychological and
social factors were measured by the Impact of
Weight on Quality of Life-Lite tool (scored 0-
100%: lower % = worse quality of life).
• We examined if psychological and social factors
influenced choice of sleeve (more invasive LSG
vs less invasive ESG).
• 25 LSG and 25 ESG patients in Queensland,
Australia, were matched for age, sex, and BMI.
They had no significant differences in
demographics, comorbidities, nor body
composition.
• Pre-procedure weight-related psychological and
social factors were measured by the Impact of
Weight on Quality of Life-Lite tool (scored 0-
100%: lower % = worse quality of life).
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Research Institute for Future Health |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Psychological and social factors as predictors of procedure choice between endoscopic and laparoscopic sleeve: A cohort study in matched cases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Related Research Outputs
- 1 Meeting Abstract
-
PSYCHOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL FACTORS AS PREDICTORS OF PROCEDURE CHOICE BETWEEN ENDOSCOPIC AND LAPAROSCOPIC SLEEVE: A COHORT STUDY IN MATCHED CASES
Marshall, S., Rich, G., Cohen, F., Soni, A. & Isenring, E., 28 Jul 2023, In: Obesity Surgery. 33, Suppl 2, p. 833-833 1 p., P-308.Research output: Contribution to journal › Meeting Abstract › Research › peer-review
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver