Provenance of Australian food products: Is there a place for geographical indications?

William Van Caenegem, Peter Drahos, Jen Cleary

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned reportResearchpeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In 1993 Australia passed legislation creating a system of registration for geographical indications (GIs) for wine, but not for non-wine food products. A GI (for example, Barossa Valley) indicates that a good possesses a special characteristic of some kind by virtue of its origin in a defined place. The policy question of whether Australia should introduce a GI registration system for non-wine food products has usually been approached through the lens of Australia’s agenda in trade negotiations (such as those in the World Trade Organization), especially the belief that most of the benefit of any globally increased protection for GIs would accrue to a small number of European countries.
While recognising that the international trade dimension is important to assessing the costs and benefits of GIs, in this Report we approach the topic not from a trade negotiations perspective, but from a regional development perspective. The use of GIs is generally justified on the basis that they offer rural regions development benefits in terms of greater investment in local value-adding, better incomes for farmers and greater employment opportunities for future generations. Our aim is to assess whether a food GI registration regime could be a useful tool to support rural and regional development in Australia.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationCanberra
PublisherRural Industries Research and Development Corporation
Number of pages98
ISBN (Print)978-1-74254-806-7
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)1440-6845

Fingerprint

Geographical indications
Food products
Registration
Trade negotiations
Regional development
Income
Wine
Food
Rural development
International trade
Farmers
European countries
World Trade Organization
Rural regions
Legislation
Costs and benefits
Agenda

Cite this

Van Caenegem, W., Drahos, P., & Cleary, J. (2015). Provenance of Australian food products: Is there a place for geographical indications? Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation.
Van Caenegem, William ; Drahos, Peter ; Cleary, Jen . / Provenance of Australian food products : Is there a place for geographical indications?. Canberra : Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2015. 98 p.
@book{0b30227868cc4dd9b121a70513fd80b1,
title = "Provenance of Australian food products: Is there a place for geographical indications?",
abstract = "In 1993 Australia passed legislation creating a system of registration for geographical indications (GIs) for wine, but not for non-wine food products. A GI (for example, Barossa Valley) indicates that a good possesses a special characteristic of some kind by virtue of its origin in a defined place. The policy question of whether Australia should introduce a GI registration system for non-wine food products has usually been approached through the lens of Australia’s agenda in trade negotiations (such as those in the World Trade Organization), especially the belief that most of the benefit of any globally increased protection for GIs would accrue to a small number of European countries.While recognising that the international trade dimension is important to assessing the costs and benefits of GIs, in this Report we approach the topic not from a trade negotiations perspective, but from a regional development perspective. The use of GIs is generally justified on the basis that they offer rural regions development benefits in terms of greater investment in local value-adding, better incomes for farmers and greater employment opportunities for future generations. Our aim is to assess whether a food GI registration regime could be a useful tool to support rural and regional development in Australia.",
author = "{Van Caenegem}, William and Peter Drahos and Jen Cleary",
year = "2015",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-74254-806-7",
publisher = "Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation",

}

Van Caenegem, W, Drahos, P & Cleary, J 2015, Provenance of Australian food products: Is there a place for geographical indications? Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.

Provenance of Australian food products : Is there a place for geographical indications? / Van Caenegem, William; Drahos, Peter; Cleary, Jen .

Canberra : Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2015. 98 p.

Research output: Book/ReportCommissioned reportResearchpeer-review

TY - BOOK

T1 - Provenance of Australian food products

T2 - Is there a place for geographical indications?

AU - Van Caenegem, William

AU - Drahos, Peter

AU - Cleary, Jen

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In 1993 Australia passed legislation creating a system of registration for geographical indications (GIs) for wine, but not for non-wine food products. A GI (for example, Barossa Valley) indicates that a good possesses a special characteristic of some kind by virtue of its origin in a defined place. The policy question of whether Australia should introduce a GI registration system for non-wine food products has usually been approached through the lens of Australia’s agenda in trade negotiations (such as those in the World Trade Organization), especially the belief that most of the benefit of any globally increased protection for GIs would accrue to a small number of European countries.While recognising that the international trade dimension is important to assessing the costs and benefits of GIs, in this Report we approach the topic not from a trade negotiations perspective, but from a regional development perspective. The use of GIs is generally justified on the basis that they offer rural regions development benefits in terms of greater investment in local value-adding, better incomes for farmers and greater employment opportunities for future generations. Our aim is to assess whether a food GI registration regime could be a useful tool to support rural and regional development in Australia.

AB - In 1993 Australia passed legislation creating a system of registration for geographical indications (GIs) for wine, but not for non-wine food products. A GI (for example, Barossa Valley) indicates that a good possesses a special characteristic of some kind by virtue of its origin in a defined place. The policy question of whether Australia should introduce a GI registration system for non-wine food products has usually been approached through the lens of Australia’s agenda in trade negotiations (such as those in the World Trade Organization), especially the belief that most of the benefit of any globally increased protection for GIs would accrue to a small number of European countries.While recognising that the international trade dimension is important to assessing the costs and benefits of GIs, in this Report we approach the topic not from a trade negotiations perspective, but from a regional development perspective. The use of GIs is generally justified on the basis that they offer rural regions development benefits in terms of greater investment in local value-adding, better incomes for farmers and greater employment opportunities for future generations. Our aim is to assess whether a food GI registration regime could be a useful tool to support rural and regional development in Australia.

M3 - Commissioned report

SN - 978-1-74254-806-7

BT - Provenance of Australian food products

PB - Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation

CY - Canberra

ER -

Van Caenegem W, Drahos P, Cleary J. Provenance of Australian food products: Is there a place for geographical indications? Canberra: Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, 2015. 98 p.