Abstract
This study finds that the Chinese experience cannot, as some have claimed, pose a challenge to the property rights theory. The unsatisfactory economic performance of the Chinese private sector in the 1980s is attributed to the discriminatory legal environment within which private property rights developed. Private property rights had to develop under the disguise of collectives. Once the political and legal environments improved in the 1990s, the private sector achieved significantly greater productivity gains and contributed more to economic growth than all other sectors. Accordingly, private property rights are crucial to economic performance; China is no exception.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 245-258 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Post-Communist Economies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2002 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Property rights, productivity gains, and economic growth: The Chinese experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver