Promoting energy inclusiveness: Is rural energy poverty a political failure?

Alex O Acheampong; Xuan-Hoa  Nghiem; Janet Dzator; Gulasekaran Rajaguru

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101639

Promoting energy inclusiveness: Is rural energy poverty a political failure?

Alex O Acheampong^*, Xuan-Hoa Nghiem^*, Janet Dzator^*, Gulasekaran Rajaguru^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

158 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We examine the impact of democracy and governance on rural electrification and rural access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking using comprehensive panel data of 34 countries from Latin America and the Caribbean between 2000 and 2020. Evidence from heteroskedasticity-based instrumental variable regression revealed that governance improves rural electrification and rural access to clean cooking fuels and technologies, while democracy of different forms limits rural electrification and rural access to clean cooking fuels and technologies. We suggest that better governance ensures justice in providing and allocating essential public services such as electricity and clean cooking solutions, not democracy.

Original language	English
Article number	101639
Pages (from-to)	1-15
Number of pages	15
Journal	Utilities Policy
Volume	84
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101639
Publication status	Published - Oct 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101639Licence: CC BY-NC-ND

Promoting energy inclusiveness Is rural energy poverty a political failureFinal published version, 3.51 MBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{b9713a5f9cc04c81a9e66bba1f91a740,

title = "Promoting energy inclusiveness: Is rural energy poverty a political failure?",

abstract = "We examine the impact of democracy and governance on rural electrification and rural access to clean fuels and technologies for cooking using comprehensive panel data of 34 countries from Latin America and the Caribbean between 2000 and 2020. Evidence from heteroskedasticity-based instrumental variable regression revealed that governance improves rural electrification and rural access to clean cooking fuels and technologies, while democracy of different forms limits rural electrification and rural access to clean cooking fuels and technologies. We suggest that better governance ensures justice in providing and allocating essential public services such as electricity and clean cooking solutions, not democracy.",

author = "Acheampong, {Alex O} and Xuan-Hoa Nghiem and Janet Dzator and Gulasekaran Rajaguru",

note = "Funding Information: The authors sincerely thank the Editor-in-Chief and the two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped improve this paper's quality. Nevertheless, the authors are responsible for all remaining errors. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 The Authors",

year = "2023",

month = oct,

doi = "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2023.101639",

language = "English",

volume = "84",

pages = "1--15",

journal = "Utilities Policy",