Professional supervision in the work rehabilitation arena in one Australian State

Niamh Boland, Jenny Strong, Libby Gibson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: This study examined the methods and frequency of professional supervision in Queensland's work rehabilitation sector. Professional supervision is regarded as an important aspect of professional development and hence, critical to the improvement of services delivered by practitioners. However, there is little documented on the extent of supervision of practitioners in this setting and even less on the impact and effectiveness of supervision. Participants: Eighty-two (82) work rehabilitation professionals participated in the study. Methods: The majority of participants (76) responded to a web-based survey that had been sent to them by a web-link, and 6 completed a paper based survey version of the survey, which evaluated the extent, practice methods, and barriers to the delivery and receipt of supervision. A follow-up focus group was held with key opinion holders to examine possible barriers to supervision in the industry. Results: 59% of the participants had not received any form of supervision in the past two years. Those who received or delivered supervision reported it to be a valuable practice. The follow-up focus group identified barriers to supervision as being pressures of commercial targets, lack of exposure to work rehabilitation in university curricula, high staff turn-over, relative inexperience of case managers and purchasers dictating product outcomes. Conclusions: The development of industry standards for supervision practice is recommended to overcome the barriers to supervision.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-165
Number of pages11
JournalWork
Volume37
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Rehabilitation
Focus Groups
Industry
Queensland
Curriculum
Pressure
Surveys and Questionnaires

Cite this

Boland, Niamh ; Strong, Jenny ; Gibson, Libby. / Professional supervision in the work rehabilitation arena in one Australian State. In: Work. 2010 ; Vol. 37, No. 2. pp. 155-165.
@article{b9731b60afed4e2faff930f0cce88fb5,
title = "Professional supervision in the work rehabilitation arena in one Australian State",
abstract = "Objective: This study examined the methods and frequency of professional supervision in Queensland's work rehabilitation sector. Professional supervision is regarded as an important aspect of professional development and hence, critical to the improvement of services delivered by practitioners. However, there is little documented on the extent of supervision of practitioners in this setting and even less on the impact and effectiveness of supervision. Participants: Eighty-two (82) work rehabilitation professionals participated in the study. Methods: The majority of participants (76) responded to a web-based survey that had been sent to them by a web-link, and 6 completed a paper based survey version of the survey, which evaluated the extent, practice methods, and barriers to the delivery and receipt of supervision. A follow-up focus group was held with key opinion holders to examine possible barriers to supervision in the industry. Results: 59{\%} of the participants had not received any form of supervision in the past two years. Those who received or delivered supervision reported it to be a valuable practice. The follow-up focus group identified barriers to supervision as being pressures of commercial targets, lack of exposure to work rehabilitation in university curricula, high staff turn-over, relative inexperience of case managers and purchasers dictating product outcomes. Conclusions: The development of industry standards for supervision practice is recommended to overcome the barriers to supervision.",
author = "Niamh Boland and Jenny Strong and Libby Gibson",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.3233/WOR-2010-1066",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "155--165",
journal = "Work",
issn = "1051-9815",
publisher = "IOS Press",
number = "2",

}

Professional supervision in the work rehabilitation arena in one Australian State. / Boland, Niamh; Strong, Jenny; Gibson, Libby.

In: Work, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2010, p. 155-165.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Professional supervision in the work rehabilitation arena in one Australian State

AU - Boland, Niamh

AU - Strong, Jenny

AU - Gibson, Libby

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Objective: This study examined the methods and frequency of professional supervision in Queensland's work rehabilitation sector. Professional supervision is regarded as an important aspect of professional development and hence, critical to the improvement of services delivered by practitioners. However, there is little documented on the extent of supervision of practitioners in this setting and even less on the impact and effectiveness of supervision. Participants: Eighty-two (82) work rehabilitation professionals participated in the study. Methods: The majority of participants (76) responded to a web-based survey that had been sent to them by a web-link, and 6 completed a paper based survey version of the survey, which evaluated the extent, practice methods, and barriers to the delivery and receipt of supervision. A follow-up focus group was held with key opinion holders to examine possible barriers to supervision in the industry. Results: 59% of the participants had not received any form of supervision in the past two years. Those who received or delivered supervision reported it to be a valuable practice. The follow-up focus group identified barriers to supervision as being pressures of commercial targets, lack of exposure to work rehabilitation in university curricula, high staff turn-over, relative inexperience of case managers and purchasers dictating product outcomes. Conclusions: The development of industry standards for supervision practice is recommended to overcome the barriers to supervision.

AB - Objective: This study examined the methods and frequency of professional supervision in Queensland's work rehabilitation sector. Professional supervision is regarded as an important aspect of professional development and hence, critical to the improvement of services delivered by practitioners. However, there is little documented on the extent of supervision of practitioners in this setting and even less on the impact and effectiveness of supervision. Participants: Eighty-two (82) work rehabilitation professionals participated in the study. Methods: The majority of participants (76) responded to a web-based survey that had been sent to them by a web-link, and 6 completed a paper based survey version of the survey, which evaluated the extent, practice methods, and barriers to the delivery and receipt of supervision. A follow-up focus group was held with key opinion holders to examine possible barriers to supervision in the industry. Results: 59% of the participants had not received any form of supervision in the past two years. Those who received or delivered supervision reported it to be a valuable practice. The follow-up focus group identified barriers to supervision as being pressures of commercial targets, lack of exposure to work rehabilitation in university curricula, high staff turn-over, relative inexperience of case managers and purchasers dictating product outcomes. Conclusions: The development of industry standards for supervision practice is recommended to overcome the barriers to supervision.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650591024&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/WOR-2010-1066

DO - 10.3233/WOR-2010-1066

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 155

EP - 165

JO - Work

JF - Work

SN - 1051-9815

IS - 2

ER -