Problems and promises of innovation: Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new

Mary Dixon-Woods, Rene Amalberti, Steve Goodman, Bo Bergman, Paul Glasziou

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

40 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Innovation is often regarded as uniformly positive. This paper shows that the role of innovation in quality improvement is more complicated. The authors identify three known paradoxes of innovation in healthcare. First, some innovations diffuse rapidly, yet are of unproven value or limited value, or pose risks, while other innovations that could potentially deliver benefits to patients remain slow to achieve uptake. Second, participatory, cooperative approaches may be the best way of achieving sustainable, positive innovation, yet relying solely on such approaches may disrupt positive innovation. Third, improvement clearly depends upon change, but change always generates new challenges. Quality improvement systems may struggle to keep up with the pace of innovation, yet evaluation of innovation is often too narrowly focused for the system-wide effects of new practices or technologies to be understood. A new recognition of the problems of innovation is proposed and it is argued that new approaches to addressing them are needed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBMJ Quality and Safety
Volume20
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011

Fingerprint

Hate
Love
Quality Improvement
Delivery of Health Care
Technology

Cite this

Dixon-Woods, Mary ; Amalberti, Rene ; Goodman, Steve ; Bergman, Bo ; Glasziou, Paul. / Problems and promises of innovation : Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new. In: BMJ Quality and Safety. 2011 ; Vol. 20, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{8d5739a37ad440d38182079bcd2b1307,
title = "Problems and promises of innovation: Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new",
abstract = "Innovation is often regarded as uniformly positive. This paper shows that the role of innovation in quality improvement is more complicated. The authors identify three known paradoxes of innovation in healthcare. First, some innovations diffuse rapidly, yet are of unproven value or limited value, or pose risks, while other innovations that could potentially deliver benefits to patients remain slow to achieve uptake. Second, participatory, cooperative approaches may be the best way of achieving sustainable, positive innovation, yet relying solely on such approaches may disrupt positive innovation. Third, improvement clearly depends upon change, but change always generates new challenges. Quality improvement systems may struggle to keep up with the pace of innovation, yet evaluation of innovation is often too narrowly focused for the system-wide effects of new practices or technologies to be understood. A new recognition of the problems of innovation is proposed and it is argued that new approaches to addressing them are needed.",
author = "Mary Dixon-Woods and Rene Amalberti and Steve Goodman and Bo Bergman and Paul Glasziou",
year = "2011",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046227",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
journal = "Quality and Safety in Health Care",
issn = "1475-3898",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

Problems and promises of innovation : Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new. / Dixon-Woods, Mary; Amalberti, Rene; Goodman, Steve; Bergman, Bo; Glasziou, Paul.

In: BMJ Quality and Safety, Vol. 20, No. SUPPL. 1, 04.2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Problems and promises of innovation

T2 - Why healthcare needs to rethink its love/hate relationship with the new

AU - Dixon-Woods, Mary

AU - Amalberti, Rene

AU - Goodman, Steve

AU - Bergman, Bo

AU - Glasziou, Paul

PY - 2011/4

Y1 - 2011/4

N2 - Innovation is often regarded as uniformly positive. This paper shows that the role of innovation in quality improvement is more complicated. The authors identify three known paradoxes of innovation in healthcare. First, some innovations diffuse rapidly, yet are of unproven value or limited value, or pose risks, while other innovations that could potentially deliver benefits to patients remain slow to achieve uptake. Second, participatory, cooperative approaches may be the best way of achieving sustainable, positive innovation, yet relying solely on such approaches may disrupt positive innovation. Third, improvement clearly depends upon change, but change always generates new challenges. Quality improvement systems may struggle to keep up with the pace of innovation, yet evaluation of innovation is often too narrowly focused for the system-wide effects of new practices or technologies to be understood. A new recognition of the problems of innovation is proposed and it is argued that new approaches to addressing them are needed.

AB - Innovation is often regarded as uniformly positive. This paper shows that the role of innovation in quality improvement is more complicated. The authors identify three known paradoxes of innovation in healthcare. First, some innovations diffuse rapidly, yet are of unproven value or limited value, or pose risks, while other innovations that could potentially deliver benefits to patients remain slow to achieve uptake. Second, participatory, cooperative approaches may be the best way of achieving sustainable, positive innovation, yet relying solely on such approaches may disrupt positive innovation. Third, improvement clearly depends upon change, but change always generates new challenges. Quality improvement systems may struggle to keep up with the pace of innovation, yet evaluation of innovation is often too narrowly focused for the system-wide effects of new practices or technologies to be understood. A new recognition of the problems of innovation is proposed and it is argued that new approaches to addressing them are needed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79957983451&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046227

DO - 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.046227

M3 - Review article

VL - 20

JO - Quality and Safety in Health Care

JF - Quality and Safety in Health Care

SN - 1475-3898

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -