Privacy—an elusive concept

Christopher Kuner, Fred H Cate, Christopher Millard, Dan Jerker B Svantesson

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It is interesting to consider how difficult it is to describe what ‘privacy’ is. Attempts at defining privacy date back, at least, to Warren and Brandeis' 1890's description of it as the ‘right to be let alone’.1 Another, more recent, definition is that privacy is ‘The interest of a person in sheltering his or her life from unwanted interference or public scrutiny.’2 Perhaps an even more sophisticated definition would be to say that privacy relates to ‘[m]aterial that so closely pertains to a person to his[/her] innermost thoughts, actions and relationships that he[/she] may legitimately claim the prerogative of deciding whether, with whom and under what circumstances he[she] will share it.’3 None of these definitions could necessarily be said to be more correct than the others, but taken together they provide a useful composite view of what we mean when we talk about privacy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-142
Number of pages2
JournalInternational Data Privacy Law
Volume1
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Privacy
Person
Prerogative
Interference

Cite this

Kuner, Christopher ; Cate, Fred H ; Millard, Christopher ; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. / Privacy—an elusive concept. In: International Data Privacy Law. 2011 ; Vol. 1, No. 3. pp. 141-142.
@article{611f564f18e24c4fa45aa430f0ce2a50,
title = "Privacy—an elusive concept",
abstract = "It is interesting to consider how difficult it is to describe what ‘privacy’ is. Attempts at defining privacy date back, at least, to Warren and Brandeis' 1890's description of it as the ‘right to be let alone’.1 Another, more recent, definition is that privacy is ‘The interest of a person in sheltering his or her life from unwanted interference or public scrutiny.’2 Perhaps an even more sophisticated definition would be to say that privacy relates to ‘[m]aterial that so closely pertains to a person to his[/her] innermost thoughts, actions and relationships that he[/she] may legitimately claim the prerogative of deciding whether, with whom and under what circumstances he[she] will share it.’3 None of these definitions could necessarily be said to be more correct than the others, but taken together they provide a useful composite view of what we mean when we talk about privacy.",
author = "Christopher Kuner and Cate, {Fred H} and Christopher Millard and Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1093/idpl/ipr014",
language = "English",
volume = "1",
pages = "141--142",
journal = "International Data Privacy Law",
issn = "2044-3994",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

Privacy—an elusive concept. / Kuner, Christopher; Cate, Fred H; Millard, Christopher; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2011, p. 141-142.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privacy—an elusive concept

AU - Kuner, Christopher

AU - Cate, Fred H

AU - Millard, Christopher

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - It is interesting to consider how difficult it is to describe what ‘privacy’ is. Attempts at defining privacy date back, at least, to Warren and Brandeis' 1890's description of it as the ‘right to be let alone’.1 Another, more recent, definition is that privacy is ‘The interest of a person in sheltering his or her life from unwanted interference or public scrutiny.’2 Perhaps an even more sophisticated definition would be to say that privacy relates to ‘[m]aterial that so closely pertains to a person to his[/her] innermost thoughts, actions and relationships that he[/she] may legitimately claim the prerogative of deciding whether, with whom and under what circumstances he[she] will share it.’3 None of these definitions could necessarily be said to be more correct than the others, but taken together they provide a useful composite view of what we mean when we talk about privacy.

AB - It is interesting to consider how difficult it is to describe what ‘privacy’ is. Attempts at defining privacy date back, at least, to Warren and Brandeis' 1890's description of it as the ‘right to be let alone’.1 Another, more recent, definition is that privacy is ‘The interest of a person in sheltering his or her life from unwanted interference or public scrutiny.’2 Perhaps an even more sophisticated definition would be to say that privacy relates to ‘[m]aterial that so closely pertains to a person to his[/her] innermost thoughts, actions and relationships that he[/she] may legitimately claim the prerogative of deciding whether, with whom and under what circumstances he[she] will share it.’3 None of these definitions could necessarily be said to be more correct than the others, but taken together they provide a useful composite view of what we mean when we talk about privacy.

U2 - 10.1093/idpl/ipr014

DO - 10.1093/idpl/ipr014

M3 - Editorial

VL - 1

SP - 141

EP - 142

JO - International Data Privacy Law

JF - International Data Privacy Law

SN - 2044-3994

IS - 3

ER -