PRISM and privacy: Will this change everything?

Christopher Kuner, Fred H Cate, Christopher Millard, Dan Jerker B Svantesson

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Both the offline and online media have reported extensively on access by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to electronic communications data held by private companies, most notably via the so-called PRISM program. Meanwhile, there is growing concern regarding reports the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is conducting massive surveillance of communications traffic both on its own behalf and for the benefit of other members of the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ (comprising the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), and other European governments have been reported to have entered into arrangements to share the data collected by the USA and the UK. At least one European government (France) allegedly also runs a vast electronic surveillance operation of its own.

We hesitate to make pronouncements about such developments before the facts are clear, but feel justified in predicting that they will have significant long-term impacts on data protection and privacy law around the world, and on the political, economic, and social climate for data processing.

Not that there is anything new in systematic governmental access to private sector data. In November 2012 we published a symposium issue (volume 2, number 4 of IDPL) containing legal analysis of such access in nine countries (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the UK, and the USA; further reports will be published in an upcoming issue), and a guest editorial concluded that it is a widespread phenomenon and gives rise to a number of legal issues that should be urgently addressed. Systematic government access to private data thus goes far beyond a particular country and a particular intelligence agency.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)217-219
Number of pages3
JournalInternational Data Privacy Law
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

privacy
communications
surveillance
privacy law
electronics
Canada
online media
data protection
national security
private sector
New Zealand
Israel
Japan
climate
France
traffic
India
China
economics

Cite this

Kuner, Christopher ; Cate, Fred H ; Millard, Christopher ; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B. / PRISM and privacy : Will this change everything?. In: International Data Privacy Law. 2013 ; Vol. 3, No. 4. pp. 217-219.
@article{314ddcc5d4bc4143a2d4d01cfeb8acb4,
title = "PRISM and privacy: Will this change everything?",
abstract = "Both the offline and online media have reported extensively on access by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to electronic communications data held by private companies, most notably via the so-called PRISM program. Meanwhile, there is growing concern regarding reports the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is conducting massive surveillance of communications traffic both on its own behalf and for the benefit of other members of the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ (comprising the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), and other European governments have been reported to have entered into arrangements to share the data collected by the USA and the UK. At least one European government (France) allegedly also runs a vast electronic surveillance operation of its own.We hesitate to make pronouncements about such developments before the facts are clear, but feel justified in predicting that they will have significant long-term impacts on data protection and privacy law around the world, and on the political, economic, and social climate for data processing.Not that there is anything new in systematic governmental access to private sector data. In November 2012 we published a symposium issue (volume 2, number 4 of IDPL) containing legal analysis of such access in nine countries (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the UK, and the USA; further reports will be published in an upcoming issue), and a guest editorial concluded that it is a widespread phenomenon and gives rise to a number of legal issues that should be urgently addressed. Systematic government access to private data thus goes far beyond a particular country and a particular intelligence agency.",
author = "Christopher Kuner and Cate, {Fred H} and Christopher Millard and Svantesson, {Dan Jerker B}",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1093/idpl/ipt020",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "217--219",
journal = "International Data Privacy Law",
issn = "2044-3994",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

PRISM and privacy : Will this change everything? / Kuner, Christopher; Cate, Fred H; Millard, Christopher; Svantesson, Dan Jerker B.

In: International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2013, p. 217-219.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - PRISM and privacy

T2 - Will this change everything?

AU - Kuner, Christopher

AU - Cate, Fred H

AU - Millard, Christopher

AU - Svantesson, Dan Jerker B

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Both the offline and online media have reported extensively on access by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to electronic communications data held by private companies, most notably via the so-called PRISM program. Meanwhile, there is growing concern regarding reports the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is conducting massive surveillance of communications traffic both on its own behalf and for the benefit of other members of the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ (comprising the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), and other European governments have been reported to have entered into arrangements to share the data collected by the USA and the UK. At least one European government (France) allegedly also runs a vast electronic surveillance operation of its own.We hesitate to make pronouncements about such developments before the facts are clear, but feel justified in predicting that they will have significant long-term impacts on data protection and privacy law around the world, and on the political, economic, and social climate for data processing.Not that there is anything new in systematic governmental access to private sector data. In November 2012 we published a symposium issue (volume 2, number 4 of IDPL) containing legal analysis of such access in nine countries (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the UK, and the USA; further reports will be published in an upcoming issue), and a guest editorial concluded that it is a widespread phenomenon and gives rise to a number of legal issues that should be urgently addressed. Systematic government access to private data thus goes far beyond a particular country and a particular intelligence agency.

AB - Both the offline and online media have reported extensively on access by the US National Security Agency (NSA) to electronic communications data held by private companies, most notably via the so-called PRISM program. Meanwhile, there is growing concern regarding reports the UK's Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) is conducting massive surveillance of communications traffic both on its own behalf and for the benefit of other members of the ‘Five Eyes Alliance’ (comprising the UK, the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand), and other European governments have been reported to have entered into arrangements to share the data collected by the USA and the UK. At least one European government (France) allegedly also runs a vast electronic surveillance operation of its own.We hesitate to make pronouncements about such developments before the facts are clear, but feel justified in predicting that they will have significant long-term impacts on data protection and privacy law around the world, and on the political, economic, and social climate for data processing.Not that there is anything new in systematic governmental access to private sector data. In November 2012 we published a symposium issue (volume 2, number 4 of IDPL) containing legal analysis of such access in nine countries (Australia, Canada, China, Germany, India, Israel, Japan, the UK, and the USA; further reports will be published in an upcoming issue), and a guest editorial concluded that it is a widespread phenomenon and gives rise to a number of legal issues that should be urgently addressed. Systematic government access to private data thus goes far beyond a particular country and a particular intelligence agency.

U2 - 10.1093/idpl/ipt020

DO - 10.1093/idpl/ipt020

M3 - Editorial

VL - 3

SP - 217

EP - 219

JO - International Data Privacy Law

JF - International Data Privacy Law

SN - 2044-3994

IS - 4

ER -