Abstract
Clinical supervision is critical for preparing podiatry students for clinical practice. However, little is
known about clinical supervisors’ preparedness to supervise podiatry students in clinical practice.
This exploratory qualitative study explored clinical supervisors’ perceptions of their preparedness
to supervise podiatry students in Australia, in terms of their training, challenges and suggestions
for improving supervision quality. Semi-structured interviews with 11 clinical supervisors (6
females, 5 males) were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Watkins’ (1990)
four-stage model characterising supervisor development was used to inform analysis. Generally,
clinical supervisors did not feel adequately prepared for their supervisory role, largely because of
a lack of formal training. Challenges included the time burden of supervision, inconsistency
regarding competence assessment standards, and student-related issues such as a perceived
lack of interest. Recommendations for improving clinical supervision included a greater
understanding of students’ learning needs and more training opportunities. Clinical supervisors
were of the opinion that partnering universities were largely responsible for ensuring quality
supervision practices. As clinical supervisors generally felt unprepared to supervise, this impacted
on their self-efficacy. Greater role clarity, training and support is thus needed to ensure clinical
supervisors are adequately prepared for the role and to facilitate progression through supervisory
developmental stages.
known about clinical supervisors’ preparedness to supervise podiatry students in clinical practice.
This exploratory qualitative study explored clinical supervisors’ perceptions of their preparedness
to supervise podiatry students in Australia, in terms of their training, challenges and suggestions
for improving supervision quality. Semi-structured interviews with 11 clinical supervisors (6
females, 5 males) were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Watkins’ (1990)
four-stage model characterising supervisor development was used to inform analysis. Generally,
clinical supervisors did not feel adequately prepared for their supervisory role, largely because of
a lack of formal training. Challenges included the time burden of supervision, inconsistency
regarding competence assessment standards, and student-related issues such as a perceived
lack of interest. Recommendations for improving clinical supervision included a greater
understanding of students’ learning needs and more training opportunities. Clinical supervisors
were of the opinion that partnering universities were largely responsible for ensuring quality
supervision practices. As clinical supervisors generally felt unprepared to supervise, this impacted
on their self-efficacy. Greater role clarity, training and support is thus needed to ensure clinical
supervisors are adequately prepared for the role and to facilitate progression through supervisory
developmental stages.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 91-108 |
Number of pages | 19 |
Journal | Australian Journal of Clinical Education |
Volume | 11 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 3 May 2022 |