Preliminary submission to the Queensland Law Reform Commission Review of the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld)

Narelle Bedford, Diana Knight

Research output: Other contributionSubmission to governmentResearch

25 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Summary of major points suggested to be included in the forthcoming QLRC
discussion paper:
1. Whether Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld) (“the
Act”) should specifically refer to mediation and related dispute resolution
interventions.
2. If retaining walls are incorporated into the Act, does the title of the Act require
alteration?
3. Are amendments necessary to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act
2009 (Qld)?
4. Whether there is a need for a register of all QCAT orders made under the Act, rather
than just for orders relating to trees as is presently required.
5. In implementing the Act, whether the Department of Justice and Attorney-General
dispute resolution centres should establish a physical and accessible presence in
Southeast Queensland beyond Brisbane.
6. In implementing the Act, what measures could be taken to increase and improve
access to justice by having greater regard to the linguistic and cultural disadvantage
of non-English speaking background disputants, disabled disputants and women and
other disadvantaged groups in society.
7. To consider how the Department of Justice and Attorney-General and Community
Legal Centres, along with Community Justice Centres can better cooperate to
achieve the Act’s objectives.
Original languageEnglish
Typesubmission
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

law reform
act
justice
mediation
amendment
speaking
linguistics
community

Cite this

@misc{93352b2c068240938cf0440557b81ab3,
title = "Preliminary submission to the Queensland Law Reform Commission Review of the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld)",
abstract = "Summary of major points suggested to be included in the forthcoming QLRCdiscussion paper:1. Whether Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld) (“theAct”) should specifically refer to mediation and related dispute resolutioninterventions.2. If retaining walls are incorporated into the Act, does the title of the Act requirealteration?3. Are amendments necessary to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld)?4. Whether there is a need for a register of all QCAT orders made under the Act, ratherthan just for orders relating to trees as is presently required.5. In implementing the Act, whether the Department of Justice and Attorney-Generaldispute resolution centres should establish a physical and accessible presence inSoutheast Queensland beyond Brisbane.6. In implementing the Act, what measures could be taken to increase and improveaccess to justice by having greater regard to the linguistic and cultural disadvantageof non-English speaking background disputants, disabled disputants and women andother disadvantaged groups in society.7. To consider how the Department of Justice and Attorney-General and CommunityLegal Centres, along with Community Justice Centres can better cooperate toachieve the Act’s objectives.",
author = "Narelle Bedford and Diana Knight",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
language = "English",
type = "Other",

}

Preliminary submission to the Queensland Law Reform Commission Review of the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld). / Bedford, Narelle; Knight, Diana.

2015, submission.

Research output: Other contributionSubmission to governmentResearch

TY - GEN

T1 - Preliminary submission to the Queensland Law Reform Commission Review of the Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld)

AU - Bedford, Narelle

AU - Knight, Diana

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - Summary of major points suggested to be included in the forthcoming QLRCdiscussion paper:1. Whether Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld) (“theAct”) should specifically refer to mediation and related dispute resolutioninterventions.2. If retaining walls are incorporated into the Act, does the title of the Act requirealteration?3. Are amendments necessary to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld)?4. Whether there is a need for a register of all QCAT orders made under the Act, ratherthan just for orders relating to trees as is presently required.5. In implementing the Act, whether the Department of Justice and Attorney-Generaldispute resolution centres should establish a physical and accessible presence inSoutheast Queensland beyond Brisbane.6. In implementing the Act, what measures could be taken to increase and improveaccess to justice by having greater regard to the linguistic and cultural disadvantageof non-English speaking background disputants, disabled disputants and women andother disadvantaged groups in society.7. To consider how the Department of Justice and Attorney-General and CommunityLegal Centres, along with Community Justice Centres can better cooperate toachieve the Act’s objectives.

AB - Summary of major points suggested to be included in the forthcoming QLRCdiscussion paper:1. Whether Neighbourhood Disputes (Dividing Fences and Trees) Act 2011 (Qld) (“theAct”) should specifically refer to mediation and related dispute resolutioninterventions.2. If retaining walls are incorporated into the Act, does the title of the Act requirealteration?3. Are amendments necessary to the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act2009 (Qld)?4. Whether there is a need for a register of all QCAT orders made under the Act, ratherthan just for orders relating to trees as is presently required.5. In implementing the Act, whether the Department of Justice and Attorney-Generaldispute resolution centres should establish a physical and accessible presence inSoutheast Queensland beyond Brisbane.6. In implementing the Act, what measures could be taken to increase and improveaccess to justice by having greater regard to the linguistic and cultural disadvantageof non-English speaking background disputants, disabled disputants and women andother disadvantaged groups in society.7. To consider how the Department of Justice and Attorney-General and CommunityLegal Centres, along with Community Justice Centres can better cooperate toachieve the Act’s objectives.

UR - https://www.qlrc.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/427412/WP72.pdf

UR - https://www.qlrc.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/466747/qlrc-report-72.pdf

M3 - Submission to government

ER -