Preliminary results of patient satisfaction with nutrition handouts versus dietetic consultation in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

Elisabeth Isenring, Giordana Cross, Elizabeth Kellett, Bogda Koczwara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To determine patient satisfaction with nutrition interventions in outpatients receiving chemotherapy identified as at nutritional risk. 

Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 61 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. A simple malnutrition screening tool was used to identify nutritional risk. Patients identified as moderate risk were triaged to receive nutrition handouts on increasing energy and protein intake. Those at high risk received nutrition counselling and support by a dietitian. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a modification of a valid and reliable satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. 

Results: Sixty-one patients entered the study and one-third (20/61) were at nutritional risk. Seven patients were at high risk, and received dietetic review while 13 patients were at moderate risk and received nutrition handouts. Patients identified as at nutritional risk (n=20) were approached to complete the satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Eighteen patients completed the questionnaire (n=7: dietetic review; and n=11: nutrition handout). Nutrition information/ advice was rated as helpful (n=15), met patient expectations (n=16) and overall patient satisfaction was rated highly. Patients who had received a dietitian review recorded a clinically but not statistically higher overall satisfaction with nutrition services than those patients receiving the nutrition handout. 

Conclusion: The high patient satisfaction helps support nutrition intervention at the chemotherapy unit. A prospective trial is required to determine the benefits of this triage and nutrition intervention on nutrition-related outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-15
Number of pages6
JournalNutrition and Dietetics
Volume65
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dietetics
Patient Satisfaction
Outpatients
Referral and Consultation
Drug Therapy
Nutritionists
Triage
Public Hospitals
Energy Intake
Malnutrition
Counseling
Cross-Sectional Studies

Cite this

@article{f7b5062970ef4e0eba5976d1cae21cae,
title = "Preliminary results of patient satisfaction with nutrition handouts versus dietetic consultation in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy",
abstract = "Aim: To determine patient satisfaction with nutrition interventions in outpatients receiving chemotherapy identified as at nutritional risk. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 61 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. A simple malnutrition screening tool was used to identify nutritional risk. Patients identified as moderate risk were triaged to receive nutrition handouts on increasing energy and protein intake. Those at high risk received nutrition counselling and support by a dietitian. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a modification of a valid and reliable satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Results: Sixty-one patients entered the study and one-third (20/61) were at nutritional risk. Seven patients were at high risk, and received dietetic review while 13 patients were at moderate risk and received nutrition handouts. Patients identified as at nutritional risk (n=20) were approached to complete the satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Eighteen patients completed the questionnaire (n=7: dietetic review; and n=11: nutrition handout). Nutrition information/ advice was rated as helpful (n=15), met patient expectations (n=16) and overall patient satisfaction was rated highly. Patients who had received a dietitian review recorded a clinically but not statistically higher overall satisfaction with nutrition services than those patients receiving the nutrition handout. Conclusion: The high patient satisfaction helps support nutrition intervention at the chemotherapy unit. A prospective trial is required to determine the benefits of this triage and nutrition intervention on nutrition-related outcomes.",
author = "Elisabeth Isenring and Giordana Cross and Elizabeth Kellett and Bogda Koczwara",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00170.x",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
pages = "10--15",
journal = "Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "1032-1322",
publisher = "Wiley-Academy",
number = "1",

}

Preliminary results of patient satisfaction with nutrition handouts versus dietetic consultation in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. / Isenring, Elisabeth; Cross, Giordana; Kellett, Elizabeth; Koczwara, Bogda.

In: Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 65, No. 1, 03.2008, p. 10-15.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preliminary results of patient satisfaction with nutrition handouts versus dietetic consultation in oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy

AU - Isenring, Elisabeth

AU - Cross, Giordana

AU - Kellett, Elizabeth

AU - Koczwara, Bogda

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - Aim: To determine patient satisfaction with nutrition interventions in outpatients receiving chemotherapy identified as at nutritional risk. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 61 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. A simple malnutrition screening tool was used to identify nutritional risk. Patients identified as moderate risk were triaged to receive nutrition handouts on increasing energy and protein intake. Those at high risk received nutrition counselling and support by a dietitian. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a modification of a valid and reliable satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Results: Sixty-one patients entered the study and one-third (20/61) were at nutritional risk. Seven patients were at high risk, and received dietetic review while 13 patients were at moderate risk and received nutrition handouts. Patients identified as at nutritional risk (n=20) were approached to complete the satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Eighteen patients completed the questionnaire (n=7: dietetic review; and n=11: nutrition handout). Nutrition information/ advice was rated as helpful (n=15), met patient expectations (n=16) and overall patient satisfaction was rated highly. Patients who had received a dietitian review recorded a clinically but not statistically higher overall satisfaction with nutrition services than those patients receiving the nutrition handout. Conclusion: The high patient satisfaction helps support nutrition intervention at the chemotherapy unit. A prospective trial is required to determine the benefits of this triage and nutrition intervention on nutrition-related outcomes.

AB - Aim: To determine patient satisfaction with nutrition interventions in outpatients receiving chemotherapy identified as at nutritional risk. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted at an Australian public hospital in 61 oncology outpatients receiving chemotherapy. A simple malnutrition screening tool was used to identify nutritional risk. Patients identified as moderate risk were triaged to receive nutrition handouts on increasing energy and protein intake. Those at high risk received nutrition counselling and support by a dietitian. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a modification of a valid and reliable satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Results: Sixty-one patients entered the study and one-third (20/61) were at nutritional risk. Seven patients were at high risk, and received dietetic review while 13 patients were at moderate risk and received nutrition handouts. Patients identified as at nutritional risk (n=20) were approached to complete the satisfaction with nutrition services questionnaire. Eighteen patients completed the questionnaire (n=7: dietetic review; and n=11: nutrition handout). Nutrition information/ advice was rated as helpful (n=15), met patient expectations (n=16) and overall patient satisfaction was rated highly. Patients who had received a dietitian review recorded a clinically but not statistically higher overall satisfaction with nutrition services than those patients receiving the nutrition handout. Conclusion: The high patient satisfaction helps support nutrition intervention at the chemotherapy unit. A prospective trial is required to determine the benefits of this triage and nutrition intervention on nutrition-related outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=40149092656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00170.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1747-0080.2007.00170.x

M3 - Article

VL - 65

SP - 10

EP - 15

JO - Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 1032-1322

IS - 1

ER -