Predicting load carriage performance: A critical review

Brad Dennien, Monica Mikhail, Rob Marc Orr, Ben Schram, Jay Dawes

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterResearchpeer-review

4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Purpose: In recreational and occupational pursuits, as well as completing daily task, humans may be required to carry external loads on their bodies. The ability to safely carry these loads during everyday activities is vital for optimal performance to be achieved and to minimize the potential for injury. The aims of this critical review were to identify studies reporting on formulas that predict load carriage, performance, critically appraise them and synthesize their findings. Methods: A search of key databases (ProQuest, Cinahl/Sports Discus, PubMed/Medline) was completed with identified studies subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were critically appraised by two authors independently utilizing the Downs and Black checklist. Pertinent data were then extracted, synthesized and tabulated. Results: Ten studies met the review criteria and ranged in critical appraisal scores from 38% to 77% with a mean score of 56 ±0.25%. A good interrater agreement (k= 0.720) existing between raters. Various loading conditions, velocities, terrains, gradients and predictive equations where utilized across the studies and all studies recorded anthropomorphic data of the participants.
Of the ten studies, six had only male participants, two had an even split between male and female participants and two studies included one female with the other participants being male. Military populations consisted of four studies, one study utilized university participants and the remaining five studies were conducted on the general public or the population was not reported. Eight studies were conducted within the USA while one in both Israel and one Belgium respectively. Conclusion: Of the 10 critically appraised articles in this critical review, it is evident that there lacks a clear and concise equation that can be used as a predictive measure to be able to accurately predict load carriage and its relation to performance and injury across varying conditions. Considering the wide-ranging requirements and contexts in which loads are carried, the potential for injuries and the potential negative impacts on recreational activities, occupational demands and daily life requirements, further research into a means of accurately predicting the costs of load carriage tasks on the human system may be of benefit.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2019
EventRocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019 - Denver, United States
Duration: 1 Mar 20192 Mar 2019
https://www.acsm.org/acsm-membership/regional-chapters/acsm-chapters/rocky-mountain/annual-meeting

Conference

ConferenceRocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019
Abbreviated titleRMACSM
CountryUnited States
CityDenver
Period1/03/192/03/19
Internet address

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Belgium
Israel
Checklist
PubMed
Population
Sports
Databases
Costs and Cost Analysis
Research

Cite this

Dennien, B., Mikhail, M., Orr, R. M., Schram, B., & Dawes, J. (2019). Predicting load carriage performance: A critical review. Poster session presented at Rocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019, Denver, United States.
Dennien, Brad ; Mikhail, Monica ; Orr, Rob Marc ; Schram, Ben ; Dawes, Jay. / Predicting load carriage performance: A critical review. Poster session presented at Rocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019, Denver, United States.
@conference{2bff17c995db41b9aa8341d0595e631f,
title = "Predicting load carriage performance:: A critical review",
abstract = "Purpose: In recreational and occupational pursuits, as well as completing daily task, humans may be required to carry external loads on their bodies. The ability to safely carry these loads during everyday activities is vital for optimal performance to be achieved and to minimize the potential for injury. The aims of this critical review were to identify studies reporting on formulas that predict load carriage, performance, critically appraise them and synthesize their findings. Methods: A search of key databases (ProQuest, Cinahl/Sports Discus, PubMed/Medline) was completed with identified studies subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were critically appraised by two authors independently utilizing the Downs and Black checklist. Pertinent data were then extracted, synthesized and tabulated. Results: Ten studies met the review criteria and ranged in critical appraisal scores from 38{\%} to 77{\%} with a mean score of 56 ±0.25{\%}. A good interrater agreement (k= 0.720) existing between raters. Various loading conditions, velocities, terrains, gradients and predictive equations where utilized across the studies and all studies recorded anthropomorphic data of the participants. Of the ten studies, six had only male participants, two had an even split between male and female participants and two studies included one female with the other participants being male. Military populations consisted of four studies, one study utilized university participants and the remaining five studies were conducted on the general public or the population was not reported. Eight studies were conducted within the USA while one in both Israel and one Belgium respectively. Conclusion: Of the 10 critically appraised articles in this critical review, it is evident that there lacks a clear and concise equation that can be used as a predictive measure to be able to accurately predict load carriage and its relation to performance and injury across varying conditions. Considering the wide-ranging requirements and contexts in which loads are carried, the potential for injuries and the potential negative impacts on recreational activities, occupational demands and daily life requirements, further research into a means of accurately predicting the costs of load carriage tasks on the human system may be of benefit.",
author = "Brad Dennien and Monica Mikhail and Orr, {Rob Marc} and Ben Schram and Jay Dawes",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "1",
language = "English",
note = "Rocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019, RMACSM ; Conference date: 01-03-2019 Through 02-03-2019",
url = "https://www.acsm.org/acsm-membership/regional-chapters/acsm-chapters/rocky-mountain/annual-meeting",

}

Dennien, B, Mikhail, M, Orr, RM, Schram, B & Dawes, J 2019, 'Predicting load carriage performance: A critical review' Rocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019, Denver, United States, 1/03/19 - 2/03/19, .

Predicting load carriage performance: A critical review. / Dennien, Brad; Mikhail, Monica; Orr, Rob Marc; Schram, Ben; Dawes, Jay.

2019. Poster session presented at Rocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019, Denver, United States.

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterResearchpeer-review

TY - CONF

T1 - Predicting load carriage performance:

T2 - A critical review

AU - Dennien, Brad

AU - Mikhail, Monica

AU - Orr, Rob Marc

AU - Schram, Ben

AU - Dawes, Jay

PY - 2019/3/1

Y1 - 2019/3/1

N2 - Purpose: In recreational and occupational pursuits, as well as completing daily task, humans may be required to carry external loads on their bodies. The ability to safely carry these loads during everyday activities is vital for optimal performance to be achieved and to minimize the potential for injury. The aims of this critical review were to identify studies reporting on formulas that predict load carriage, performance, critically appraise them and synthesize their findings. Methods: A search of key databases (ProQuest, Cinahl/Sports Discus, PubMed/Medline) was completed with identified studies subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were critically appraised by two authors independently utilizing the Downs and Black checklist. Pertinent data were then extracted, synthesized and tabulated. Results: Ten studies met the review criteria and ranged in critical appraisal scores from 38% to 77% with a mean score of 56 ±0.25%. A good interrater agreement (k= 0.720) existing between raters. Various loading conditions, velocities, terrains, gradients and predictive equations where utilized across the studies and all studies recorded anthropomorphic data of the participants. Of the ten studies, six had only male participants, two had an even split between male and female participants and two studies included one female with the other participants being male. Military populations consisted of four studies, one study utilized university participants and the remaining five studies were conducted on the general public or the population was not reported. Eight studies were conducted within the USA while one in both Israel and one Belgium respectively. Conclusion: Of the 10 critically appraised articles in this critical review, it is evident that there lacks a clear and concise equation that can be used as a predictive measure to be able to accurately predict load carriage and its relation to performance and injury across varying conditions. Considering the wide-ranging requirements and contexts in which loads are carried, the potential for injuries and the potential negative impacts on recreational activities, occupational demands and daily life requirements, further research into a means of accurately predicting the costs of load carriage tasks on the human system may be of benefit.

AB - Purpose: In recreational and occupational pursuits, as well as completing daily task, humans may be required to carry external loads on their bodies. The ability to safely carry these loads during everyday activities is vital for optimal performance to be achieved and to minimize the potential for injury. The aims of this critical review were to identify studies reporting on formulas that predict load carriage, performance, critically appraise them and synthesize their findings. Methods: A search of key databases (ProQuest, Cinahl/Sports Discus, PubMed/Medline) was completed with identified studies subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Included studies were critically appraised by two authors independently utilizing the Downs and Black checklist. Pertinent data were then extracted, synthesized and tabulated. Results: Ten studies met the review criteria and ranged in critical appraisal scores from 38% to 77% with a mean score of 56 ±0.25%. A good interrater agreement (k= 0.720) existing between raters. Various loading conditions, velocities, terrains, gradients and predictive equations where utilized across the studies and all studies recorded anthropomorphic data of the participants. Of the ten studies, six had only male participants, two had an even split between male and female participants and two studies included one female with the other participants being male. Military populations consisted of four studies, one study utilized university participants and the remaining five studies were conducted on the general public or the population was not reported. Eight studies were conducted within the USA while one in both Israel and one Belgium respectively. Conclusion: Of the 10 critically appraised articles in this critical review, it is evident that there lacks a clear and concise equation that can be used as a predictive measure to be able to accurately predict load carriage and its relation to performance and injury across varying conditions. Considering the wide-ranging requirements and contexts in which loads are carried, the potential for injuries and the potential negative impacts on recreational activities, occupational demands and daily life requirements, further research into a means of accurately predicting the costs of load carriage tasks on the human system may be of benefit.

UR - https://www.acsm.org/docs/default-source/regional-chapter-individual-folders/rocky-mountain/rmacsm_porgram_19_final.pdf?sfvrsn=e57d11d_2

UR - https://www.acsm.org/docs/default-source/regional-chapter-individual-folders/rocky-mountain/2019-rmacsm-abstracts.pdf?sfvrsn=45f80241_2

M3 - Poster

ER -

Dennien B, Mikhail M, Orr RM, Schram B, Dawes J. Predicting load carriage performance: A critical review. 2019. Poster session presented at Rocky Mountain American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting 2019, Denver, United States.