Praxis of performance measurement in public-private partnerships: Moving beyond the iron triangle

Junxiao Liu, Peter E D Love, Jim Smith, Jane Matthews, Chun Pong Sing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An effective and efficient performance measurement is deemed to be pivotal for ensuring owners' and stakeholders' needs are being met throughout a project's lifecycle. To determine the nature of performance measurement in Australian public-private partnerships (PPPs), an interpretivist approach that utilized semistructured interviews was undertaken in the State of Western Australia. A total of 25 interviews were conducted with key stakeholders and it was revealed that there was a proclivity for performance measurements during design and construction to focus on traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations that were aligned to the conventional iron triangle: time, cost, and quality (TCQ). However, there was widespread consensus among the interviewees that the traditional TCQ approach was too simplistic to capture the inherent complexities associated with social infrastructure PPPs. In addressing this issue the analysis indicates that process-based lifecycle performance measurement that strategically places an emphasis on value for money (VfM) should be introduced into PPPs to replace traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations. It is suggested that this type of measurement can be integrated with a broader VfM assessment and a series of key performance indicators to enable the public and private sectors to improve their performance throughout a project's lifecycle. The empirical analysis provides the foundations for developing a performance measurement that can ensure assets are future proofed over their lifecycles.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04016004
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering - ASCE
Volume32
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Iron
Performance measurement
Praxis
Public-private partnerships
Costs
Life cycle
Ex-post evaluation
Time costs
Value for money
Stakeholders

Cite this

@article{b35848670c46455bb3ab232c95d37671,
title = "Praxis of performance measurement in public-private partnerships: Moving beyond the iron triangle",
abstract = "An effective and efficient performance measurement is deemed to be pivotal for ensuring owners' and stakeholders' needs are being met throughout a project's lifecycle. To determine the nature of performance measurement in Australian public-private partnerships (PPPs), an interpretivist approach that utilized semistructured interviews was undertaken in the State of Western Australia. A total of 25 interviews were conducted with key stakeholders and it was revealed that there was a proclivity for performance measurements during design and construction to focus on traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations that were aligned to the conventional iron triangle: time, cost, and quality (TCQ). However, there was widespread consensus among the interviewees that the traditional TCQ approach was too simplistic to capture the inherent complexities associated with social infrastructure PPPs. In addressing this issue the analysis indicates that process-based lifecycle performance measurement that strategically places an emphasis on value for money (VfM) should be introduced into PPPs to replace traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations. It is suggested that this type of measurement can be integrated with a broader VfM assessment and a series of key performance indicators to enable the public and private sectors to improve their performance throughout a project's lifecycle. The empirical analysis provides the foundations for developing a performance measurement that can ensure assets are future proofed over their lifecycles.",
author = "Junxiao Liu and Love, {Peter E D} and Jim Smith and Jane Matthews and Sing, {Chun Pong}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000433",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers",
number = "4",

}

Praxis of performance measurement in public-private partnerships: Moving beyond the iron triangle. / Liu, Junxiao; Love, Peter E D; Smith, Jim; Matthews, Jane; Sing, Chun Pong.

In: Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE, Vol. 32, No. 4, 04016004, 01.07.2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Praxis of performance measurement in public-private partnerships: Moving beyond the iron triangle

AU - Liu, Junxiao

AU - Love, Peter E D

AU - Smith, Jim

AU - Matthews, Jane

AU - Sing, Chun Pong

PY - 2016/7/1

Y1 - 2016/7/1

N2 - An effective and efficient performance measurement is deemed to be pivotal for ensuring owners' and stakeholders' needs are being met throughout a project's lifecycle. To determine the nature of performance measurement in Australian public-private partnerships (PPPs), an interpretivist approach that utilized semistructured interviews was undertaken in the State of Western Australia. A total of 25 interviews were conducted with key stakeholders and it was revealed that there was a proclivity for performance measurements during design and construction to focus on traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations that were aligned to the conventional iron triangle: time, cost, and quality (TCQ). However, there was widespread consensus among the interviewees that the traditional TCQ approach was too simplistic to capture the inherent complexities associated with social infrastructure PPPs. In addressing this issue the analysis indicates that process-based lifecycle performance measurement that strategically places an emphasis on value for money (VfM) should be introduced into PPPs to replace traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations. It is suggested that this type of measurement can be integrated with a broader VfM assessment and a series of key performance indicators to enable the public and private sectors to improve their performance throughout a project's lifecycle. The empirical analysis provides the foundations for developing a performance measurement that can ensure assets are future proofed over their lifecycles.

AB - An effective and efficient performance measurement is deemed to be pivotal for ensuring owners' and stakeholders' needs are being met throughout a project's lifecycle. To determine the nature of performance measurement in Australian public-private partnerships (PPPs), an interpretivist approach that utilized semistructured interviews was undertaken in the State of Western Australia. A total of 25 interviews were conducted with key stakeholders and it was revealed that there was a proclivity for performance measurements during design and construction to focus on traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations that were aligned to the conventional iron triangle: time, cost, and quality (TCQ). However, there was widespread consensus among the interviewees that the traditional TCQ approach was too simplistic to capture the inherent complexities associated with social infrastructure PPPs. In addressing this issue the analysis indicates that process-based lifecycle performance measurement that strategically places an emphasis on value for money (VfM) should be introduced into PPPs to replace traditional ex ante and ex post evaluations. It is suggested that this type of measurement can be integrated with a broader VfM assessment and a series of key performance indicators to enable the public and private sectors to improve their performance throughout a project's lifecycle. The empirical analysis provides the foundations for developing a performance measurement that can ensure assets are future proofed over their lifecycles.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975263303&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000433

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000433

M3 - Article

VL - 32

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 4

M1 - 04016004

ER -