Practitioners' views and use of evidence-based treatment: Positive attitudes but missed opportunities in children's services

Rae Thomas, Melanie J. Zimmer-Gembeck, Mark Chaffin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The extent evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are used in clinical practice within the Australian therapeutic child welfare sector is unknown. In this study, we investigated practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and use of EBT when providing interventions to children and families and how the intended outcomes of interventions are evaluated. Practitioners (N = 112) from 41 non-government organizations were surveyed and reported few barriers to implementing EBTs and positive attitudes. While just over half the practitioners surveyed provided an accurate definition of EBT, 72 % of practitioners reported using EBTs in their clinical practice. Of those, 88 % reported modifying the EBT, however interventions were rarely evaluated systematically. Implications for the use of EBTs, how they are modified, and the role of systematic evaluation are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)368-378
Number of pages11
JournalAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Therapeutics
Child Welfare
Organizations

Cite this

@article{919476b9910c46a2867703385aa2a1ba,
title = "Practitioners' views and use of evidence-based treatment: Positive attitudes but missed opportunities in children's services",
abstract = "The extent evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are used in clinical practice within the Australian therapeutic child welfare sector is unknown. In this study, we investigated practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and use of EBT when providing interventions to children and families and how the intended outcomes of interventions are evaluated. Practitioners (N = 112) from 41 non-government organizations were surveyed and reported few barriers to implementing EBTs and positive attitudes. While just over half the practitioners surveyed provided an accurate definition of EBT, 72 {\%} of practitioners reported using EBTs in their clinical practice. Of those, 88 {\%} reported modifying the EBT, however interventions were rarely evaluated systematically. Implications for the use of EBTs, how they are modified, and the role of systematic evaluation are discussed.",
author = "Rae Thomas and Zimmer-Gembeck, {Melanie J.} and Mark Chaffin",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1007/s10488-013-0471-y",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "368--378",
journal = "Administration in Mental Health",
issn = "0894-587X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Practitioners' views and use of evidence-based treatment : Positive attitudes but missed opportunities in children's services. / Thomas, Rae; Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J.; Chaffin, Mark.

In: Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2014, p. 368-378.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Practitioners' views and use of evidence-based treatment

T2 - Positive attitudes but missed opportunities in children's services

AU - Thomas, Rae

AU - Zimmer-Gembeck, Melanie J.

AU - Chaffin, Mark

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - The extent evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are used in clinical practice within the Australian therapeutic child welfare sector is unknown. In this study, we investigated practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and use of EBT when providing interventions to children and families and how the intended outcomes of interventions are evaluated. Practitioners (N = 112) from 41 non-government organizations were surveyed and reported few barriers to implementing EBTs and positive attitudes. While just over half the practitioners surveyed provided an accurate definition of EBT, 72 % of practitioners reported using EBTs in their clinical practice. Of those, 88 % reported modifying the EBT, however interventions were rarely evaluated systematically. Implications for the use of EBTs, how they are modified, and the role of systematic evaluation are discussed.

AB - The extent evidence-based treatments (EBTs) are used in clinical practice within the Australian therapeutic child welfare sector is unknown. In this study, we investigated practitioners' knowledge, attitudes, and use of EBT when providing interventions to children and families and how the intended outcomes of interventions are evaluated. Practitioners (N = 112) from 41 non-government organizations were surveyed and reported few barriers to implementing EBTs and positive attitudes. While just over half the practitioners surveyed provided an accurate definition of EBT, 72 % of practitioners reported using EBTs in their clinical practice. Of those, 88 % reported modifying the EBT, however interventions were rarely evaluated systematically. Implications for the use of EBTs, how they are modified, and the role of systematic evaluation are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898452486&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10488-013-0471-y

DO - 10.1007/s10488-013-0471-y

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 368

EP - 378

JO - Administration in Mental Health

JF - Administration in Mental Health

SN - 0894-587X

IS - 3

ER -