Power-knowledge in Australian legal education: Corporatism's reign

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

"Corporatism” is the name commonly given to the approach to legal education which prioritises the accountability of staff and students, the efficiency of the teaching process and the marketability of the law school. It is an approach which is frequently questioned and criticised by legal scholars but which is nevertheless increasingly widespread. This paper seeks to determine how and why corporatism exists and persists within Australian law schools. It does so not by proving or disproving corporatism’s claims to truth, but by conducting an analysis of corporatism as a vector of power-knowledge. As a form of knowledge, corporatism’s success is attributable to the convergence of a range of historical, social and political contingencies. As an expression of power, corporatism deploys a range of compelling disciplinary strategies — including normalisation, hierarchical observation and the enforcement of micro-rewards and micro-penalties — in the achievement of its objectives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)587-612
Number of pages26
JournalThe Sydney Law Review
Volume26
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

corporatism
school law
education
normalization
contingency
reward
penalty
staff
efficiency
responsibility
Teaching
student

Cite this

@article{e45d31c71b21471fa564b7630942e3c9,
title = "Power-knowledge in Australian legal education: Corporatism's reign",
abstract = "{"}Corporatism” is the name commonly given to the approach to legal education which prioritises the accountability of staff and students, the efficiency of the teaching process and the marketability of the law school. It is an approach which is frequently questioned and criticised by legal scholars but which is nevertheless increasingly widespread. This paper seeks to determine how and why corporatism exists and persists within Australian law schools. It does so not by proving or disproving corporatism’s claims to truth, but by conducting an analysis of corporatism as a vector of power-knowledge. As a form of knowledge, corporatism’s success is attributable to the convergence of a range of historical, social and political contingencies. As an expression of power, corporatism deploys a range of compelling disciplinary strategies — including normalisation, hierarchical observation and the enforcement of micro-rewards and micro-penalties — in the achievement of its objectives.",
author = "Nickolas James",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "587--612",
journal = "The Sydney Law Review",
issn = "0082-0512",
publisher = "University of Sydney",
number = "4",

}

Power-knowledge in Australian legal education : Corporatism's reign. / James, Nickolas.

In: The Sydney Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2004, p. 587-612.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power-knowledge in Australian legal education

T2 - Corporatism's reign

AU - James, Nickolas

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - "Corporatism” is the name commonly given to the approach to legal education which prioritises the accountability of staff and students, the efficiency of the teaching process and the marketability of the law school. It is an approach which is frequently questioned and criticised by legal scholars but which is nevertheless increasingly widespread. This paper seeks to determine how and why corporatism exists and persists within Australian law schools. It does so not by proving or disproving corporatism’s claims to truth, but by conducting an analysis of corporatism as a vector of power-knowledge. As a form of knowledge, corporatism’s success is attributable to the convergence of a range of historical, social and political contingencies. As an expression of power, corporatism deploys a range of compelling disciplinary strategies — including normalisation, hierarchical observation and the enforcement of micro-rewards and micro-penalties — in the achievement of its objectives.

AB - "Corporatism” is the name commonly given to the approach to legal education which prioritises the accountability of staff and students, the efficiency of the teaching process and the marketability of the law school. It is an approach which is frequently questioned and criticised by legal scholars but which is nevertheless increasingly widespread. This paper seeks to determine how and why corporatism exists and persists within Australian law schools. It does so not by proving or disproving corporatism’s claims to truth, but by conducting an analysis of corporatism as a vector of power-knowledge. As a form of knowledge, corporatism’s success is attributable to the convergence of a range of historical, social and political contingencies. As an expression of power, corporatism deploys a range of compelling disciplinary strategies — including normalisation, hierarchical observation and the enforcement of micro-rewards and micro-penalties — in the achievement of its objectives.

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 587

EP - 612

JO - The Sydney Law Review

JF - The Sydney Law Review

SN - 0082-0512

IS - 4

ER -