Political Efficacy, Social Network and Involvement in Public Deliberation in Rural China

Zhijun Pei, Yingchun Pan*, Martin Skitmore

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
36 Downloads (Pure)


This study examines the role of political efficacy and social networks in rural China to understand the social characteristics that might affect an individual’s disposition to join in public deliberations. A model is developed and empirically tested by Partial Least Squares analysis. This shows active involvement in public deliberation to be positively influenced by political efficacy (with external political efficacy being a partial mediator), high internal or external political efficacy, and a high internal efficacy leading to high external political efficacy. Social networks have a moderating effect, individuals with a high social network status having an enhanced positive internal political efficacy-public deliberation involvement but weakened positive external political efficacy-public deliberation involvement. The research advances the theoretical understanding of complex political psycho-behavior relationships and provided insights into the role of social settings. The findings could also help boost deliberative democracy in such limited democratic societies as China.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)453-471
Number of pages19
JournalSocial Indicators Research
Issue number2
Early online date30 Aug 2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2018
Externally publishedYes


Dive into the research topics of 'Political Efficacy, Social Network and Involvement in Public Deliberation in Rural China'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this