Peer-assisted learning and small-group teaching to improve practice placement quality and capacity in dietetics

Dianne P. Reidlinger, Judy Lawrence, Jane E. Thomas, Kevin Whelan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been positively evaluated during practice placements for medical, nursing and some allied health professional students. The aim of this study was to evaluate a PAL and small-group teaching model of dietetic practice placement education implemented in the UK setting as part of a quality improvement process. Methods: A PAL placement model was adapted from a previously published Australian model, implemented and evaluated among dietetic students at King's College London and with their practice educators. Process evaluation with students and practice educators from PAL practice placements at two sites and traditional 1:1 practice placements at six sites consisted of weekly questionnaires and end-of-placement focus groups with 16 students and 35 practice educators. Perceptions of the barriers, concerns and strengths of the novel model were identified. Results: Implementing the PAL placement model at just two sites increased placement capacity by 12 students, a 1.3-fold increase across London. Students on PAL placements reported a good learning experience (89.3 vs 67.7%; P<0.001) and a satisfactory workload (83.1 vs 61.3%, P=0.005) more frequently than those on a traditional 1:1 placement. Practice educators reported significantly less time undertaking direct student supervision on PAL practice placements compared to 1:1 placements (153minutes/week 95% confidence interval (CI) 124-183 vs 264minutes/week 95% CI 204-324; P=0.001). Conclusions: PAL practice placements offer potential benefits to placement capacity and possibly quality. The detailed evaluation will enable others to implement similar novel models of dietetics placements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)349-356
Number of pages8
JournalNutrition and Dietetics
Volume74
Issue number4
Early online date29 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Dietetics
Teaching
Learning
Students
Confidence Intervals
Allied Health Personnel
Quality Improvement
Workload
Focus Groups
Nursing
Education

Cite this

@article{d7aac4d4d6bf498b89344a372c9d1e45,
title = "Peer-assisted learning and small-group teaching to improve practice placement quality and capacity in dietetics",
abstract = "Aim: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been positively evaluated during practice placements for medical, nursing and some allied health professional students. The aim of this study was to evaluate a PAL and small-group teaching model of dietetic practice placement education implemented in the UK setting as part of a quality improvement process. Methods: A PAL placement model was adapted from a previously published Australian model, implemented and evaluated among dietetic students at King's College London and with their practice educators. Process evaluation with students and practice educators from PAL practice placements at two sites and traditional 1:1 practice placements at six sites consisted of weekly questionnaires and end-of-placement focus groups with 16 students and 35 practice educators. Perceptions of the barriers, concerns and strengths of the novel model were identified. Results: Implementing the PAL placement model at just two sites increased placement capacity by 12 students, a 1.3-fold increase across London. Students on PAL placements reported a good learning experience (89.3 vs 67.7{\%}; P<0.001) and a satisfactory workload (83.1 vs 61.3{\%}, P=0.005) more frequently than those on a traditional 1:1 placement. Practice educators reported significantly less time undertaking direct student supervision on PAL practice placements compared to 1:1 placements (153minutes/week 95{\%} confidence interval (CI) 124-183 vs 264minutes/week 95{\%} CI 204-324; P=0.001). Conclusions: PAL practice placements offer potential benefits to placement capacity and possibly quality. The detailed evaluation will enable others to implement similar novel models of dietetics placements.",
author = "Reidlinger, {Dianne P.} and Judy Lawrence and Thomas, {Jane E.} and Kevin Whelan",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1747-0080.12293",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "349--356",
journal = "Nutrition and Dietetics",
issn = "1032-1322",
publisher = "Wiley-Academy",
number = "4",

}

Peer-assisted learning and small-group teaching to improve practice placement quality and capacity in dietetics. / Reidlinger, Dianne P.; Lawrence, Judy; Thomas, Jane E.; Whelan, Kevin.

In: Nutrition and Dietetics, Vol. 74, No. 4, 01.09.2017, p. 349-356.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Peer-assisted learning and small-group teaching to improve practice placement quality and capacity in dietetics

AU - Reidlinger, Dianne P.

AU - Lawrence, Judy

AU - Thomas, Jane E.

AU - Whelan, Kevin

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - Aim: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been positively evaluated during practice placements for medical, nursing and some allied health professional students. The aim of this study was to evaluate a PAL and small-group teaching model of dietetic practice placement education implemented in the UK setting as part of a quality improvement process. Methods: A PAL placement model was adapted from a previously published Australian model, implemented and evaluated among dietetic students at King's College London and with their practice educators. Process evaluation with students and practice educators from PAL practice placements at two sites and traditional 1:1 practice placements at six sites consisted of weekly questionnaires and end-of-placement focus groups with 16 students and 35 practice educators. Perceptions of the barriers, concerns and strengths of the novel model were identified. Results: Implementing the PAL placement model at just two sites increased placement capacity by 12 students, a 1.3-fold increase across London. Students on PAL placements reported a good learning experience (89.3 vs 67.7%; P<0.001) and a satisfactory workload (83.1 vs 61.3%, P=0.005) more frequently than those on a traditional 1:1 placement. Practice educators reported significantly less time undertaking direct student supervision on PAL practice placements compared to 1:1 placements (153minutes/week 95% confidence interval (CI) 124-183 vs 264minutes/week 95% CI 204-324; P=0.001). Conclusions: PAL practice placements offer potential benefits to placement capacity and possibly quality. The detailed evaluation will enable others to implement similar novel models of dietetics placements.

AB - Aim: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been positively evaluated during practice placements for medical, nursing and some allied health professional students. The aim of this study was to evaluate a PAL and small-group teaching model of dietetic practice placement education implemented in the UK setting as part of a quality improvement process. Methods: A PAL placement model was adapted from a previously published Australian model, implemented and evaluated among dietetic students at King's College London and with their practice educators. Process evaluation with students and practice educators from PAL practice placements at two sites and traditional 1:1 practice placements at six sites consisted of weekly questionnaires and end-of-placement focus groups with 16 students and 35 practice educators. Perceptions of the barriers, concerns and strengths of the novel model were identified. Results: Implementing the PAL placement model at just two sites increased placement capacity by 12 students, a 1.3-fold increase across London. Students on PAL placements reported a good learning experience (89.3 vs 67.7%; P<0.001) and a satisfactory workload (83.1 vs 61.3%, P=0.005) more frequently than those on a traditional 1:1 placement. Practice educators reported significantly less time undertaking direct student supervision on PAL practice placements compared to 1:1 placements (153minutes/week 95% confidence interval (CI) 124-183 vs 264minutes/week 95% CI 204-324; P=0.001). Conclusions: PAL practice placements offer potential benefits to placement capacity and possibly quality. The detailed evaluation will enable others to implement similar novel models of dietetics placements.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994351922&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1747-0080.12293

DO - 10.1111/1747-0080.12293

M3 - Article

VL - 74

SP - 349

EP - 356

JO - Nutrition and Dietetics

JF - Nutrition and Dietetics

SN - 1032-1322

IS - 4

ER -