Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology

Janice Catterall, Pauline Ross, Claire Aitchison, Shelley Burgin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The current higher education climate seems to be demanding increasing levels of written output from
doctoral researchers during candidature. In this context this study employed an online questionnaire,
individual interviews and focus group discussions to collect information on the challenges and successes of
doctoral writing. It was found that feedback on student writing was universally regarded as the primary
pedagogical tool for teaching and learning research writing and for most, the supervisor’s role was central to
this. Some supervisors employed ‘writing for publication’ as a complimentary tool. A number of supervisors
and students also reported positively about the value of participating in social writing and critiquing
environments such as writing groups, writing retreats, or writing for peer feedback. This research suggests
that there would be benefit in tertiary institutions pursuing a more systematic approach to the support of
writing both as a learning tool for research students and for the promotion of a vibrant, scholarly, research community.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Volume8
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Fingerprint

science
student
group discussion
learning
promotion
climate
questionnaire
Teaching
interview
community
education
Group

Cite this

Catterall, Janice ; Ross, Pauline ; Aitchison, Claire ; Burgin, Shelley. / Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology. In: Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2011 ; Vol. 8, No. 2. pp. 1-10.
@article{031c052ac6f84ff5a4bc11615425a5e3,
title = "Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology",
abstract = "The current higher education climate seems to be demanding increasing levels of written output fromdoctoral researchers during candidature. In this context this study employed an online questionnaire,individual interviews and focus group discussions to collect information on the challenges and successes ofdoctoral writing. It was found that feedback on student writing was universally regarded as the primarypedagogical tool for teaching and learning research writing and for most, the supervisor’s role was central tothis. Some supervisors employed ‘writing for publication’ as a complimentary tool. A number of supervisorsand students also reported positively about the value of participating in social writing and critiquingenvironments such as writing groups, writing retreats, or writing for peer feedback. This research suggeststhat there would be benefit in tertiary institutions pursuing a more systematic approach to the support ofwriting both as a learning tool for research students and for the promotion of a vibrant, scholarly, research community.",
author = "Janice Catterall and Pauline Ross and Claire Aitchison and Shelley Burgin",
year = "2011",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice",
issn = "1449-9789",
publisher = "University of Wollongong",
number = "2",

}

Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology. / Catterall, Janice; Ross, Pauline; Aitchison, Claire; Burgin, Shelley.

In: Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2011, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pedagogical approaches that facilitate writing in postgraduate research candidature in science and technology

AU - Catterall, Janice

AU - Ross, Pauline

AU - Aitchison, Claire

AU - Burgin, Shelley

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The current higher education climate seems to be demanding increasing levels of written output fromdoctoral researchers during candidature. In this context this study employed an online questionnaire,individual interviews and focus group discussions to collect information on the challenges and successes ofdoctoral writing. It was found that feedback on student writing was universally regarded as the primarypedagogical tool for teaching and learning research writing and for most, the supervisor’s role was central tothis. Some supervisors employed ‘writing for publication’ as a complimentary tool. A number of supervisorsand students also reported positively about the value of participating in social writing and critiquingenvironments such as writing groups, writing retreats, or writing for peer feedback. This research suggeststhat there would be benefit in tertiary institutions pursuing a more systematic approach to the support ofwriting both as a learning tool for research students and for the promotion of a vibrant, scholarly, research community.

AB - The current higher education climate seems to be demanding increasing levels of written output fromdoctoral researchers during candidature. In this context this study employed an online questionnaire,individual interviews and focus group discussions to collect information on the challenges and successes ofdoctoral writing. It was found that feedback on student writing was universally regarded as the primarypedagogical tool for teaching and learning research writing and for most, the supervisor’s role was central tothis. Some supervisors employed ‘writing for publication’ as a complimentary tool. A number of supervisorsand students also reported positively about the value of participating in social writing and critiquingenvironments such as writing groups, writing retreats, or writing for peer feedback. This research suggeststhat there would be benefit in tertiary institutions pursuing a more systematic approach to the support ofwriting both as a learning tool for research students and for the promotion of a vibrant, scholarly, research community.

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice

JF - Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice

SN - 1449-9789

IS - 2

ER -