Abstract
Objective: To determine whether elevations of validity indices on the Personality Assessment Inventory (Morey, 1991) vary across assessment contexts and types of clinical presentation. Method:A review of 400 cases presenting across different forensic contexts (worker’s compensation claims,victims of crime compensation claims, personal injury compensation claims; and pre-sentence) where the PAI was administered as part of a psycho-legal evaluation. Discriminant function analysis was employed. Results & Conclusions:Base rates for elevation of validity indices on the PAI may vary across assessment context and reported psychopathology. Implications for assessment using the PAI are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 252-252 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | International Journal of Psychology |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 3-4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Patterns of elevated PAI validity indices across assessment contexts and presenting psychopathology: Implications for assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver