Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina: The Role of Health Literacy

Samuel T Savitz, Claudia C Dobler, Nilay D Shah, Antonia V Bennett, Stacy Cooper Bailey, Stacie B Dusetzina, W Schuyler Jones, Sally C Stearns, Victor M Montori

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Stable angina patients have difficulty understanding the tradeoffs between treatment alternatives. In this analysis, we assessed treatment planning conversations for stable angina to determine whether inadequate health literacy acts as a barrier to communication that may partially explain this difficulty.

Methods: We conducted a descriptive analysis of patient questionnaire data from the PCI Choice Trial. The main outcomes were the responses to the Decisional Conflict Scale and the proportion of correct responses to knowledge questions about stable angina. We also conducted a qualitative analysis on recordings of patient-clinician discussions about treatment planning. The recordings were coded with the OPTION12 instrument for shared decision-making. Two analysts independently assessed the number and types of patient questions and expressions of preferences.

Results: Patient engagement did not differ by health literacy level and was generally low for all patients with respect to OPTION12 scores and the number of questions related to clinical aspects of treatment. Patients with inadequate health literacy had significantly higher decisional conflict. However, the proportion of knowledge questions answered correctly did not differ significantly by health literacy level.

Conclusions: Patients with inadequate health literacy had greater decisional conflict but no difference in knowledge compared to patients with adequate health literacy. Inadequate health literacy may act as a barrier to communication, but gaps were found in patient engagement and knowledge for patients of all health literacy levels. The recorded patient-clinician encounters and the health literacy measure were valuable resources for conducting research on care delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number42
JournaleGEMS
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Aug 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Health Literacy
Stable Angina
Decision Making
Communication Barriers
Patient Participation
Therapeutics

Cite this

Savitz, S. T., Dobler, C. C., Shah, N. D., Bennett, A. V., Bailey, S. C., Dusetzina, S. B., ... Montori, V. M. (2019). Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina: The Role of Health Literacy. eGEMS , 7(1), [42]. https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.306
Savitz, Samuel T ; Dobler, Claudia C ; Shah, Nilay D ; Bennett, Antonia V ; Bailey, Stacy Cooper ; Dusetzina, Stacie B ; Jones, W Schuyler ; Stearns, Sally C ; Montori, Victor M. / Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina : The Role of Health Literacy. In: eGEMS . 2019 ; Vol. 7, No. 1.
@article{e558ede1eeb84db1bed4902362bfc6ae,
title = "Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina: The Role of Health Literacy",
abstract = "Background: Stable angina patients have difficulty understanding the tradeoffs between treatment alternatives. In this analysis, we assessed treatment planning conversations for stable angina to determine whether inadequate health literacy acts as a barrier to communication that may partially explain this difficulty.Methods: We conducted a descriptive analysis of patient questionnaire data from the PCI Choice Trial. The main outcomes were the responses to the Decisional Conflict Scale and the proportion of correct responses to knowledge questions about stable angina. We also conducted a qualitative analysis on recordings of patient-clinician discussions about treatment planning. The recordings were coded with the OPTION12 instrument for shared decision-making. Two analysts independently assessed the number and types of patient questions and expressions of preferences.Results: Patient engagement did not differ by health literacy level and was generally low for all patients with respect to OPTION12 scores and the number of questions related to clinical aspects of treatment. Patients with inadequate health literacy had significantly higher decisional conflict. However, the proportion of knowledge questions answered correctly did not differ significantly by health literacy level.Conclusions: Patients with inadequate health literacy had greater decisional conflict but no difference in knowledge compared to patients with adequate health literacy. Inadequate health literacy may act as a barrier to communication, but gaps were found in patient engagement and knowledge for patients of all health literacy levels. The recorded patient-clinician encounters and the health literacy measure were valuable resources for conducting research on care delivery.",
author = "Savitz, {Samuel T} and Dobler, {Claudia C} and Shah, {Nilay D} and Bennett, {Antonia V} and Bailey, {Stacy Cooper} and Dusetzina, {Stacie B} and Jones, {W Schuyler} and Stearns, {Sally C} and Montori, {Victor M}",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
day = "9",
doi = "10.5334/egems.306",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
journal = "eGEMS",
issn = "2327-9214",
publisher = "Ubiquity Press, Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Savitz, ST, Dobler, CC, Shah, ND, Bennett, AV, Bailey, SC, Dusetzina, SB, Jones, WS, Stearns, SC & Montori, VM 2019, 'Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina: The Role of Health Literacy' eGEMS , vol. 7, no. 1, 42. https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.306

Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina : The Role of Health Literacy. / Savitz, Samuel T; Dobler, Claudia C; Shah, Nilay D; Bennett, Antonia V; Bailey, Stacy Cooper; Dusetzina, Stacie B; Jones, W Schuyler; Stearns, Sally C; Montori, Victor M.

In: eGEMS , Vol. 7, No. 1, 42, 09.08.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina

T2 - The Role of Health Literacy

AU - Savitz, Samuel T

AU - Dobler, Claudia C

AU - Shah, Nilay D

AU - Bennett, Antonia V

AU - Bailey, Stacy Cooper

AU - Dusetzina, Stacie B

AU - Jones, W Schuyler

AU - Stearns, Sally C

AU - Montori, Victor M

PY - 2019/8/9

Y1 - 2019/8/9

N2 - Background: Stable angina patients have difficulty understanding the tradeoffs between treatment alternatives. In this analysis, we assessed treatment planning conversations for stable angina to determine whether inadequate health literacy acts as a barrier to communication that may partially explain this difficulty.Methods: We conducted a descriptive analysis of patient questionnaire data from the PCI Choice Trial. The main outcomes were the responses to the Decisional Conflict Scale and the proportion of correct responses to knowledge questions about stable angina. We also conducted a qualitative analysis on recordings of patient-clinician discussions about treatment planning. The recordings were coded with the OPTION12 instrument for shared decision-making. Two analysts independently assessed the number and types of patient questions and expressions of preferences.Results: Patient engagement did not differ by health literacy level and was generally low for all patients with respect to OPTION12 scores and the number of questions related to clinical aspects of treatment. Patients with inadequate health literacy had significantly higher decisional conflict. However, the proportion of knowledge questions answered correctly did not differ significantly by health literacy level.Conclusions: Patients with inadequate health literacy had greater decisional conflict but no difference in knowledge compared to patients with adequate health literacy. Inadequate health literacy may act as a barrier to communication, but gaps were found in patient engagement and knowledge for patients of all health literacy levels. The recorded patient-clinician encounters and the health literacy measure were valuable resources for conducting research on care delivery.

AB - Background: Stable angina patients have difficulty understanding the tradeoffs between treatment alternatives. In this analysis, we assessed treatment planning conversations for stable angina to determine whether inadequate health literacy acts as a barrier to communication that may partially explain this difficulty.Methods: We conducted a descriptive analysis of patient questionnaire data from the PCI Choice Trial. The main outcomes were the responses to the Decisional Conflict Scale and the proportion of correct responses to knowledge questions about stable angina. We also conducted a qualitative analysis on recordings of patient-clinician discussions about treatment planning. The recordings were coded with the OPTION12 instrument for shared decision-making. Two analysts independently assessed the number and types of patient questions and expressions of preferences.Results: Patient engagement did not differ by health literacy level and was generally low for all patients with respect to OPTION12 scores and the number of questions related to clinical aspects of treatment. Patients with inadequate health literacy had significantly higher decisional conflict. However, the proportion of knowledge questions answered correctly did not differ significantly by health literacy level.Conclusions: Patients with inadequate health literacy had greater decisional conflict but no difference in knowledge compared to patients with adequate health literacy. Inadequate health literacy may act as a barrier to communication, but gaps were found in patient engagement and knowledge for patients of all health literacy levels. The recorded patient-clinician encounters and the health literacy measure were valuable resources for conducting research on care delivery.

U2 - 10.5334/egems.306

DO - 10.5334/egems.306

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - eGEMS

JF - eGEMS

SN - 2327-9214

IS - 1

M1 - 42

ER -

Savitz ST, Dobler CC, Shah ND, Bennett AV, Bailey SC, Dusetzina SB et al. Patient-Clinician Decision Making for Stable Angina: The Role of Health Literacy. eGEMS . 2019 Aug 9;7(1). 42. https://doi.org/10.5334/egems.306