Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability: A one-and two-year follow-up study

  • William R. Lindsay*
  • , Tony Holland
  • , Jessica R. Wheeler
  • , Derek Carson
  • , Gregory O'Brien
  • , John L. Taylor
  • , Lesley Steptoe
  • , Claire Middleton
  • , Karen Price
  • , Susan Johnston
  • , Steven J. Young
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The pathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability were reviewed. Participants were 197 offenders with intellectual disability accepted into three types of community and three types of secure forensic intellectual disability services. They were first compared with 280 participants referred but not accepted into services and were then followed-up for 2 years to review pathways through services. Those accepted into services had a higher charge rate than did those who were referred (46% and 25%, respectively). The greatest diversity in pathway was seen in participants in community forensic intellectual disability and inpatient services. Individuals in secure settings showed the least diversity over time, and, similarly, a relatively high percentage of those accepted into generic community services remained in these services.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)250-262
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Volume115
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2010
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pathways through services for offenders with intellectual disability: A one-and two-year follow-up study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this