Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in Australien im Jahr 2017

Lyndal J. Trevena, Heather L. Shepherd, Carissa Bonner, Jesse Jansen, Anne E Cust, Julie Leask, Narelle Shadbolt, Chris Del Mar, Kirsten J McCaffery, Tammy Hoffmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)
17 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Shared Decision Making (SDM) is now firmly established within national clinical standards for accrediting hospitals, day procedure services, public dental services and medical education in Australia, with plans to align general practice, aged care and disability service. Implementation of these standards and training of health professionals is a key challenge for the Australian health sector at this time. Consumer involvement in health research, policy and clinical service governance has also increased, with a major focus on encouraging patients to ask questions during their clinical care. Tools to support shared decision making are increasingly used but there is a need for more systemic approaches to their development, cultural adaptation and implementation. Sustainable solutions to ensure tools are kept up-to-date with the best available evidence will be important for the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)17-20
Number of pages4
JournalZeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen
Volume123-124
Early online date18 May 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Clinical Governance
Dental Education
Health
Health Policy
Medical Education
General Practice
decision making
cultural development
research policy
health
health professionals
public service
disability
Research
governance
evidence
education
Community Participation
time

Cite this

Trevena, Lyndal J. ; Shepherd, Heather L. ; Bonner, Carissa ; Jansen, Jesse ; Cust, Anne E ; Leask, Julie ; Shadbolt, Narelle ; Del Mar, Chris ; McCaffery, Kirsten J ; Hoffmann, Tammy. / Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in Australien im Jahr 2017. In: Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen. 2017 ; Vol. 123-124. pp. 17-20.
@article{636bfcf248d54bb0858de60f1d24412c,
title = "Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in Australien im Jahr 2017",
abstract = "Shared Decision Making (SDM) is now firmly established within national clinical standards for accrediting hospitals, day procedure services, public dental services and medical education in Australia, with plans to align general practice, aged care and disability service. Implementation of these standards and training of health professionals is a key challenge for the Australian health sector at this time. Consumer involvement in health research, policy and clinical service governance has also increased, with a major focus on encouraging patients to ask questions during their clinical care. Tools to support shared decision making are increasingly used but there is a need for more systemic approaches to their development, cultural adaptation and implementation. Sustainable solutions to ensure tools are kept up-to-date with the best available evidence will be important for the future.",
author = "Trevena, {Lyndal J.} and Shepherd, {Heather L.} and Carissa Bonner and Jesse Jansen and Cust, {Anne E} and Julie Leask and Narelle Shadbolt and {Del Mar}, Chris and McCaffery, {Kirsten J} and Tammy Hoffmann",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.011",
language = "English",
volume = "123-124",
pages = "17--20",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen",
issn = "1865-9217",
publisher = "Urban und Fischer Verlag Jena",

}

Trevena, LJ, Shepherd, HL, Bonner, C, Jansen, J, Cust, AE, Leask, J, Shadbolt, N, Del Mar, C, McCaffery, KJ & Hoffmann, T 2017, 'Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in Australien im Jahr 2017' Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, vol. 123-124, pp. 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.011

Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in Australien im Jahr 2017. / Trevena, Lyndal J.; Shepherd, Heather L.; Bonner, Carissa; Jansen, Jesse; Cust, Anne E; Leask, Julie; Shadbolt, Narelle; Del Mar, Chris; McCaffery, Kirsten J; Hoffmann, Tammy.

In: Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen, Vol. 123-124, 01.06.2017, p. 17-20.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in Australien im Jahr 2017

AU - Trevena, Lyndal J.

AU - Shepherd, Heather L.

AU - Bonner, Carissa

AU - Jansen, Jesse

AU - Cust, Anne E

AU - Leask, Julie

AU - Shadbolt, Narelle

AU - Del Mar, Chris

AU - McCaffery, Kirsten J

AU - Hoffmann, Tammy

N1 - Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Shared Decision Making (SDM) is now firmly established within national clinical standards for accrediting hospitals, day procedure services, public dental services and medical education in Australia, with plans to align general practice, aged care and disability service. Implementation of these standards and training of health professionals is a key challenge for the Australian health sector at this time. Consumer involvement in health research, policy and clinical service governance has also increased, with a major focus on encouraging patients to ask questions during their clinical care. Tools to support shared decision making are increasingly used but there is a need for more systemic approaches to their development, cultural adaptation and implementation. Sustainable solutions to ensure tools are kept up-to-date with the best available evidence will be important for the future.

AB - Shared Decision Making (SDM) is now firmly established within national clinical standards for accrediting hospitals, day procedure services, public dental services and medical education in Australia, with plans to align general practice, aged care and disability service. Implementation of these standards and training of health professionals is a key challenge for the Australian health sector at this time. Consumer involvement in health research, policy and clinical service governance has also increased, with a major focus on encouraging patients to ask questions during their clinical care. Tools to support shared decision making are increasingly used but there is a need for more systemic approaches to their development, cultural adaptation and implementation. Sustainable solutions to ensure tools are kept up-to-date with the best available evidence will be important for the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019379785&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.011

DO - 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.05.011

M3 - Article

VL - 123-124

SP - 17

EP - 20

JO - Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

JF - Zeitschrift fur Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat im Gesundheitswesen

SN - 1865-9217

ER -