Participatory project management for improved disaster resilience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Disaster response and recovery is implemented through multiple projects with traditional project management approaches criticised as too time consuming and inflexible in circumstances of high uncertainty, requiring rapid reaction for multiple stakeholders. This research aims to understand the role of project and stakeholder management in the management of disasters as an opening for identifying improved disaster resilience opportunities using participatory project management approaches. Design/methodology/approach: Using the 2011 Queensland floods as a case study, the positioning of project management in disaster management discourse was investigated through summative content analysis. Findings: Results demonstrate that project and stakeholder engagement are poorly positioned in current disaster management discourse, although risk management appears more central, closely associated with disaster response. Research limitations/implications: This is the first stage of more extensive reviews of the positioning of project management in disaster management policies and practice. Further stages will involve a wider range of texts and textual analysis. Practical implications: Results confirm poor recognition of traditional project management approaches in disaster management discourse indicating potential for more innovative and participatory approaches integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives to support disaster resilience. Social implications: Achieving improved community safety and disaster resilience requires multiple stakeholder collaboration for capability development in effective management of projects required to predict, respond and recover from disastrous events. Originality/value: The paper addresses the sparse overlap between project and disaster management literatures identifying potential for more participatory management of disaster events.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)317-333
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment
Volume4
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

Project management
Disasters
Risk management
Recovery

Cite this

@article{5779abe847bc47b78b4658bb8b42fe01,
title = "Participatory project management for improved disaster resilience",
abstract = "Purpose: Disaster response and recovery is implemented through multiple projects with traditional project management approaches criticised as too time consuming and inflexible in circumstances of high uncertainty, requiring rapid reaction for multiple stakeholders. This research aims to understand the role of project and stakeholder management in the management of disasters as an opening for identifying improved disaster resilience opportunities using participatory project management approaches. Design/methodology/approach: Using the 2011 Queensland floods as a case study, the positioning of project management in disaster management discourse was investigated through summative content analysis. Findings: Results demonstrate that project and stakeholder engagement are poorly positioned in current disaster management discourse, although risk management appears more central, closely associated with disaster response. Research limitations/implications: This is the first stage of more extensive reviews of the positioning of project management in disaster management policies and practice. Further stages will involve a wider range of texts and textual analysis. Practical implications: Results confirm poor recognition of traditional project management approaches in disaster management discourse indicating potential for more innovative and participatory approaches integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives to support disaster resilience. Social implications: Achieving improved community safety and disaster resilience requires multiple stakeholder collaboration for capability development in effective management of projects required to predict, respond and recover from disastrous events. Originality/value: The paper addresses the sparse overlap between project and disaster management literatures identifying potential for more participatory management of disaster events.",
author = "Lynn Crawford and Craig Langston and Bhishna Bajracharya",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2012-0020",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "317--333",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment",
issn = "1759-5908",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Participatory project management for improved disaster resilience. / Crawford, Lynn; Langston, Craig; Bajracharya, Bhishna.

In: International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2013, p. 317-333.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participatory project management for improved disaster resilience

AU - Crawford, Lynn

AU - Langston, Craig

AU - Bajracharya, Bhishna

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Purpose: Disaster response and recovery is implemented through multiple projects with traditional project management approaches criticised as too time consuming and inflexible in circumstances of high uncertainty, requiring rapid reaction for multiple stakeholders. This research aims to understand the role of project and stakeholder management in the management of disasters as an opening for identifying improved disaster resilience opportunities using participatory project management approaches. Design/methodology/approach: Using the 2011 Queensland floods as a case study, the positioning of project management in disaster management discourse was investigated through summative content analysis. Findings: Results demonstrate that project and stakeholder engagement are poorly positioned in current disaster management discourse, although risk management appears more central, closely associated with disaster response. Research limitations/implications: This is the first stage of more extensive reviews of the positioning of project management in disaster management policies and practice. Further stages will involve a wider range of texts and textual analysis. Practical implications: Results confirm poor recognition of traditional project management approaches in disaster management discourse indicating potential for more innovative and participatory approaches integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives to support disaster resilience. Social implications: Achieving improved community safety and disaster resilience requires multiple stakeholder collaboration for capability development in effective management of projects required to predict, respond and recover from disastrous events. Originality/value: The paper addresses the sparse overlap between project and disaster management literatures identifying potential for more participatory management of disaster events.

AB - Purpose: Disaster response and recovery is implemented through multiple projects with traditional project management approaches criticised as too time consuming and inflexible in circumstances of high uncertainty, requiring rapid reaction for multiple stakeholders. This research aims to understand the role of project and stakeholder management in the management of disasters as an opening for identifying improved disaster resilience opportunities using participatory project management approaches. Design/methodology/approach: Using the 2011 Queensland floods as a case study, the positioning of project management in disaster management discourse was investigated through summative content analysis. Findings: Results demonstrate that project and stakeholder engagement are poorly positioned in current disaster management discourse, although risk management appears more central, closely associated with disaster response. Research limitations/implications: This is the first stage of more extensive reviews of the positioning of project management in disaster management policies and practice. Further stages will involve a wider range of texts and textual analysis. Practical implications: Results confirm poor recognition of traditional project management approaches in disaster management discourse indicating potential for more innovative and participatory approaches integrating multiple stakeholder perspectives to support disaster resilience. Social implications: Achieving improved community safety and disaster resilience requires multiple stakeholder collaboration for capability development in effective management of projects required to predict, respond and recover from disastrous events. Originality/value: The paper addresses the sparse overlap between project and disaster management literatures identifying potential for more participatory management of disaster events.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884169935&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2012-0020

DO - 10.1108/IJDRBE-07-2012-0020

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 317

EP - 333

JO - International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment

JF - International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment

SN - 1759-5908

IS - 3

ER -