Parsing out the effects of personal consumption norms and industry influences on food consumption volume

Natalina Zlatevska, Mark T. Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to test whether individuals possess personal consumption norms and idiosyncratic reference points to which they target behaviour. These personal consumption norms are related to the amount of food consumed independent of industry influences, specifically the size of the package offered and the perceived healthiness of the food. We also examine the extent to which one’s commitment to adhere to their personal consumption norm (referred to as “commitment to norm”) influences food consumption volume. Design/methodology/approach: Three experiments are presented, two involve estimates of food consumption and the third examines actual food consumption. Findings: All studies demonstrate that participants can provide a personal consumption norm for how much food they would typically consume that is independent of manipulated industry influences and that actual consumption is significantly related to their personal consumption norms. Furthermore, commitment to norm is negatively related to the absolute difference between their personal consumption norm and the amount of food consumed; however, supporting evidence was only realized in the case of actual food consumption, suggesting that commitment to norm does not have an effect on the formation of intentions. Research limitations/implications: The authors demonstrate that at a point in time, personal norms are fixed. However, it is possible that norms may be shaped by industry influences over time. The authors suggest further research into how these personal norms evolve over time, as well as assessing how these norms affect the likelihood of going from zero consumption to some positive amount. Practical implications: Many studies indicate that marketers can easily influence food consumption volume. However, their ability to influence actual consumption volume is circumscribed by factors beyond their control, namely idiosyncratic personal consumption norms. Social implications: Over time, it is likely that personal consumption norms have emanated from a variety of antecedents, almost certainly including prior industry experience and situational/social influences. Repeated exposure to external influences is likely to shift the personal norm reference point over time. Originality/value: Personal consumption norms are carefully disentangled from industry influences and are shown to significantly relate to food consumption volume, independent (but not to the exclusion) of industry influences.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)377-396
Number of pages20
JournalEuropean Journal of Marketing
Volume50
Issue number3-4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Industry
Food consumption
Food
Reference point
Experiment
Marketers
Personal values
Factors
Social influence
Exclusion
Design methodology

Cite this

@article{bfbfd8d2dcab46de90c226561f86350e,
title = "Parsing out the effects of personal consumption norms and industry influences on food consumption volume",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to test whether individuals possess personal consumption norms and idiosyncratic reference points to which they target behaviour. These personal consumption norms are related to the amount of food consumed independent of industry influences, specifically the size of the package offered and the perceived healthiness of the food. We also examine the extent to which one’s commitment to adhere to their personal consumption norm (referred to as “commitment to norm”) influences food consumption volume. Design/methodology/approach: Three experiments are presented, two involve estimates of food consumption and the third examines actual food consumption. Findings: All studies demonstrate that participants can provide a personal consumption norm for how much food they would typically consume that is independent of manipulated industry influences and that actual consumption is significantly related to their personal consumption norms. Furthermore, commitment to norm is negatively related to the absolute difference between their personal consumption norm and the amount of food consumed; however, supporting evidence was only realized in the case of actual food consumption, suggesting that commitment to norm does not have an effect on the formation of intentions. Research limitations/implications: The authors demonstrate that at a point in time, personal norms are fixed. However, it is possible that norms may be shaped by industry influences over time. The authors suggest further research into how these personal norms evolve over time, as well as assessing how these norms affect the likelihood of going from zero consumption to some positive amount. Practical implications: Many studies indicate that marketers can easily influence food consumption volume. However, their ability to influence actual consumption volume is circumscribed by factors beyond their control, namely idiosyncratic personal consumption norms. Social implications: Over time, it is likely that personal consumption norms have emanated from a variety of antecedents, almost certainly including prior industry experience and situational/social influences. Repeated exposure to external influences is likely to shift the personal norm reference point over time. Originality/value: Personal consumption norms are carefully disentangled from industry influences and are shown to significantly relate to food consumption volume, independent (but not to the exclusion) of industry influences.",
author = "Natalina Zlatevska and Spence, {Mark T.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/EJM-09-2014-0574",
language = "English",
volume = "50",
pages = "377--396",
journal = "European Journal of Marketing",
issn = "0309-0566",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3-4",

}

Parsing out the effects of personal consumption norms and industry influences on food consumption volume. / Zlatevska, Natalina; Spence, Mark T.

In: European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 50, No. 3-4, 2016, p. 377-396.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Parsing out the effects of personal consumption norms and industry influences on food consumption volume

AU - Zlatevska, Natalina

AU - Spence, Mark T.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to test whether individuals possess personal consumption norms and idiosyncratic reference points to which they target behaviour. These personal consumption norms are related to the amount of food consumed independent of industry influences, specifically the size of the package offered and the perceived healthiness of the food. We also examine the extent to which one’s commitment to adhere to their personal consumption norm (referred to as “commitment to norm”) influences food consumption volume. Design/methodology/approach: Three experiments are presented, two involve estimates of food consumption and the third examines actual food consumption. Findings: All studies demonstrate that participants can provide a personal consumption norm for how much food they would typically consume that is independent of manipulated industry influences and that actual consumption is significantly related to their personal consumption norms. Furthermore, commitment to norm is negatively related to the absolute difference between their personal consumption norm and the amount of food consumed; however, supporting evidence was only realized in the case of actual food consumption, suggesting that commitment to norm does not have an effect on the formation of intentions. Research limitations/implications: The authors demonstrate that at a point in time, personal norms are fixed. However, it is possible that norms may be shaped by industry influences over time. The authors suggest further research into how these personal norms evolve over time, as well as assessing how these norms affect the likelihood of going from zero consumption to some positive amount. Practical implications: Many studies indicate that marketers can easily influence food consumption volume. However, their ability to influence actual consumption volume is circumscribed by factors beyond their control, namely idiosyncratic personal consumption norms. Social implications: Over time, it is likely that personal consumption norms have emanated from a variety of antecedents, almost certainly including prior industry experience and situational/social influences. Repeated exposure to external influences is likely to shift the personal norm reference point over time. Originality/value: Personal consumption norms are carefully disentangled from industry influences and are shown to significantly relate to food consumption volume, independent (but not to the exclusion) of industry influences.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to test whether individuals possess personal consumption norms and idiosyncratic reference points to which they target behaviour. These personal consumption norms are related to the amount of food consumed independent of industry influences, specifically the size of the package offered and the perceived healthiness of the food. We also examine the extent to which one’s commitment to adhere to their personal consumption norm (referred to as “commitment to norm”) influences food consumption volume. Design/methodology/approach: Three experiments are presented, two involve estimates of food consumption and the third examines actual food consumption. Findings: All studies demonstrate that participants can provide a personal consumption norm for how much food they would typically consume that is independent of manipulated industry influences and that actual consumption is significantly related to their personal consumption norms. Furthermore, commitment to norm is negatively related to the absolute difference between their personal consumption norm and the amount of food consumed; however, supporting evidence was only realized in the case of actual food consumption, suggesting that commitment to norm does not have an effect on the formation of intentions. Research limitations/implications: The authors demonstrate that at a point in time, personal norms are fixed. However, it is possible that norms may be shaped by industry influences over time. The authors suggest further research into how these personal norms evolve over time, as well as assessing how these norms affect the likelihood of going from zero consumption to some positive amount. Practical implications: Many studies indicate that marketers can easily influence food consumption volume. However, their ability to influence actual consumption volume is circumscribed by factors beyond their control, namely idiosyncratic personal consumption norms. Social implications: Over time, it is likely that personal consumption norms have emanated from a variety of antecedents, almost certainly including prior industry experience and situational/social influences. Repeated exposure to external influences is likely to shift the personal norm reference point over time. Originality/value: Personal consumption norms are carefully disentangled from industry influences and are shown to significantly relate to food consumption volume, independent (but not to the exclusion) of industry influences.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010332655&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/EJM-09-2014-0574

DO - 10.1108/EJM-09-2014-0574

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 377

EP - 396

JO - European Journal of Marketing

JF - European Journal of Marketing

SN - 0309-0566

IS - 3-4

ER -