Abstract
The European Court of Justice's recent judgement in the joined cases C-585/08 and C-144/09 will have substantial long-term implications for European e-businesses and e-consumers trading across borders. The key question considered was whether the fact that a website can be consulted on the Internet in the Member State of the consumer's domicile is sufficient to justify a finding that commercial or professional activities are being directed to that Member State within the meaning of Article 15(1)(c) of the Brussels I Regulation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 298-304 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Computer Law and Security Review |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2011 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof - ECJ decision creates further uncertainty about when e-businesses "direct activities" to a consumer's state under the Brussels i Regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver