Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes

Michael S Roberts, Julie A Stokes, Michelle A King, Teresa A Lynne, David M Purdie, PP Glasziou, D Amdrew J Wilson, Sean T McCarthy, Geoffrey E Brooks, Ferdinandus J de Looze, CB Del Mar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

159 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims To evaluate whether year long clinical pharmacy program involving development of professional relationships, nurse education on medication issues, and individualized medication reviews could change drug use, mortality and morbidity in nursing home residents.

Methods A cluster randomised controlled trial, where an intervention home was matched to three control homes, was used to examine the effect of the clinical pharmacy intervention on resident outcomes. The study involved 905 residents in 13 intervention nursing homes and 2325 residents in 39, control nursing homes in southeast Queensland and north-east New South Wales, Australia. The outcome measures were. continuous drug use data from government prescription subsidy claims, cross-sectional drug use data on prescribed and administered medications, deaths and morbidity indices (hospitalization rates, adverse events and disability indices).

Results This intervention resulted in a reduction in drug use with no change in morbidity indices or survival. Differences in nursing home characteristics as defined by cluster analysis with SUDAAN(R). negated intervention-related apparent significant improvements in survival. The use of benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. laxatives, histamine H-2-receptor antagonists and antacids was significantly reduced in the intervention group, whereas the use of digoxin and diuretics remained similar to controls. Overall, drug use in the intervention group was reduced by 14.8%, relative to the controls, equivalent to an annual prescription saving of $A64 per resident (approximately pound 25).

Conclusions This intervention improved nursing home resident outcomes related to changes in drug use and drug-related expenditure. The continuing divergence in both drug use and survival at the end of the study suggests that the difference would have been more significant in a larger and longer study, and even more so using additional instruments specific for measuring outcomes related to changes in drug use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257-265
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Volume51
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2001
Externally publishedYes

Cite this

Roberts, Michael S ; Stokes, Julie A ; King, Michelle A ; Lynne, Teresa A ; Purdie, David M ; Glasziou, PP ; Wilson, D Amdrew J ; McCarthy, Sean T ; Brooks, Geoffrey E ; de Looze, Ferdinandus J ; Del Mar, CB. / Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes. In: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2001 ; Vol. 51, No. 3. pp. 257-265.
@article{f9577a98093a4743b7eeb15efdf93236,
title = "Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes",
abstract = "Aims To evaluate whether year long clinical pharmacy program involving development of professional relationships, nurse education on medication issues, and individualized medication reviews could change drug use, mortality and morbidity in nursing home residents.Methods A cluster randomised controlled trial, where an intervention home was matched to three control homes, was used to examine the effect of the clinical pharmacy intervention on resident outcomes. The study involved 905 residents in 13 intervention nursing homes and 2325 residents in 39, control nursing homes in southeast Queensland and north-east New South Wales, Australia. The outcome measures were. continuous drug use data from government prescription subsidy claims, cross-sectional drug use data on prescribed and administered medications, deaths and morbidity indices (hospitalization rates, adverse events and disability indices).Results This intervention resulted in a reduction in drug use with no change in morbidity indices or survival. Differences in nursing home characteristics as defined by cluster analysis with SUDAAN(R). negated intervention-related apparent significant improvements in survival. The use of benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. laxatives, histamine H-2-receptor antagonists and antacids was significantly reduced in the intervention group, whereas the use of digoxin and diuretics remained similar to controls. Overall, drug use in the intervention group was reduced by 14.8{\%}, relative to the controls, equivalent to an annual prescription saving of $A64 per resident (approximately pound 25).Conclusions This intervention improved nursing home resident outcomes related to changes in drug use and drug-related expenditure. The continuing divergence in both drug use and survival at the end of the study suggests that the difference would have been more significant in a larger and longer study, and even more so using additional instruments specific for measuring outcomes related to changes in drug use.",
author = "Roberts, {Michael S} and Stokes, {Julie A} and King, {Michelle A} and Lynne, {Teresa A} and Purdie, {David M} and PP Glasziou and Wilson, {D Amdrew J} and McCarthy, {Sean T} and Brooks, {Geoffrey E} and {de Looze}, {Ferdinandus J} and {Del Mar}, CB",
year = "2001",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00347.x",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "257--265",
journal = "British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology",
issn = "0306-5251",
publisher = "BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD",
number = "3",

}

Roberts, MS, Stokes, JA, King, MA, Lynne, TA, Purdie, DM, Glasziou, PP, Wilson, DAJ, McCarthy, ST, Brooks, GE, de Looze, FJ & Del Mar, CB 2001, 'Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes' British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 257-265. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00347.x

Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes. / Roberts, Michael S; Stokes, Julie A; King, Michelle A; Lynne, Teresa A; Purdie, David M; Glasziou, PP; Wilson, D Amdrew J; McCarthy, Sean T; Brooks, Geoffrey E; de Looze, Ferdinandus J; Del Mar, CB.

In: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Vol. 51, No. 3, 03.2001, p. 257-265.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of a clinical pharmacy intervention in 52 nursing homes

AU - Roberts, Michael S

AU - Stokes, Julie A

AU - King, Michelle A

AU - Lynne, Teresa A

AU - Purdie, David M

AU - Glasziou, PP

AU - Wilson, D Amdrew J

AU - McCarthy, Sean T

AU - Brooks, Geoffrey E

AU - de Looze, Ferdinandus J

AU - Del Mar, CB

PY - 2001/3

Y1 - 2001/3

N2 - Aims To evaluate whether year long clinical pharmacy program involving development of professional relationships, nurse education on medication issues, and individualized medication reviews could change drug use, mortality and morbidity in nursing home residents.Methods A cluster randomised controlled trial, where an intervention home was matched to three control homes, was used to examine the effect of the clinical pharmacy intervention on resident outcomes. The study involved 905 residents in 13 intervention nursing homes and 2325 residents in 39, control nursing homes in southeast Queensland and north-east New South Wales, Australia. The outcome measures were. continuous drug use data from government prescription subsidy claims, cross-sectional drug use data on prescribed and administered medications, deaths and morbidity indices (hospitalization rates, adverse events and disability indices).Results This intervention resulted in a reduction in drug use with no change in morbidity indices or survival. Differences in nursing home characteristics as defined by cluster analysis with SUDAAN(R). negated intervention-related apparent significant improvements in survival. The use of benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. laxatives, histamine H-2-receptor antagonists and antacids was significantly reduced in the intervention group, whereas the use of digoxin and diuretics remained similar to controls. Overall, drug use in the intervention group was reduced by 14.8%, relative to the controls, equivalent to an annual prescription saving of $A64 per resident (approximately pound 25).Conclusions This intervention improved nursing home resident outcomes related to changes in drug use and drug-related expenditure. The continuing divergence in both drug use and survival at the end of the study suggests that the difference would have been more significant in a larger and longer study, and even more so using additional instruments specific for measuring outcomes related to changes in drug use.

AB - Aims To evaluate whether year long clinical pharmacy program involving development of professional relationships, nurse education on medication issues, and individualized medication reviews could change drug use, mortality and morbidity in nursing home residents.Methods A cluster randomised controlled trial, where an intervention home was matched to three control homes, was used to examine the effect of the clinical pharmacy intervention on resident outcomes. The study involved 905 residents in 13 intervention nursing homes and 2325 residents in 39, control nursing homes in southeast Queensland and north-east New South Wales, Australia. The outcome measures were. continuous drug use data from government prescription subsidy claims, cross-sectional drug use data on prescribed and administered medications, deaths and morbidity indices (hospitalization rates, adverse events and disability indices).Results This intervention resulted in a reduction in drug use with no change in morbidity indices or survival. Differences in nursing home characteristics as defined by cluster analysis with SUDAAN(R). negated intervention-related apparent significant improvements in survival. The use of benzodiazepines, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. laxatives, histamine H-2-receptor antagonists and antacids was significantly reduced in the intervention group, whereas the use of digoxin and diuretics remained similar to controls. Overall, drug use in the intervention group was reduced by 14.8%, relative to the controls, equivalent to an annual prescription saving of $A64 per resident (approximately pound 25).Conclusions This intervention improved nursing home resident outcomes related to changes in drug use and drug-related expenditure. The continuing divergence in both drug use and survival at the end of the study suggests that the difference would have been more significant in a larger and longer study, and even more so using additional instruments specific for measuring outcomes related to changes in drug use.

U2 - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00347.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.00347.x

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 257

EP - 265

JO - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

JF - British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

SN - 0306-5251

IS - 3

ER -