Organizational autoethnography

Kenneth Parry, Maree Boyle

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Our aim for this chapter is to begin a long and hopefully fruitful conversation about how and why autoethnography can help make valuable contributions to organizational studies. We contend that the prime role of an organizational autoethnographic study is to illuminate the relationship between the individual and the organization. Indeed, the ethnographic process has always been an essential way of studying culture, especially culture as it is practiced and understood within institutional and organizational settings. We contend that, in the spirit of Carolyn Ellis' (1997) work on introspective and retrospective forays into the self, the study of organizations and culture can be significantly enhanced by the inclusion of work conducted and located within the autoethnographic genre.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Sage handbook of organisational research methods
EditorsD Buchanan, A Bryman
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherSAGE Publications Ltd
Pages690-702
Number of pages13
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9781412931182
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Fingerprint

Autoethnography
Organizational studies
Inclusion

Cite this

Parry, K., & Boyle, M. (2009). Organizational autoethnography. In D. Buchanan, & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organisational research methods (1 ed., pp. 690-702). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Parry, Kenneth ; Boyle, Maree. / Organizational autoethnography. The Sage handbook of organisational research methods. editor / D Buchanan ; A Bryman. 1. ed. London : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009. pp. 690-702
@inbook{1b76e96bbbac4c6bb76160d0431bac6d,
title = "Organizational autoethnography",
abstract = "Our aim for this chapter is to begin a long and hopefully fruitful conversation about how and why autoethnography can help make valuable contributions to organizational studies. We contend that the prime role of an organizational autoethnographic study is to illuminate the relationship between the individual and the organization. Indeed, the ethnographic process has always been an essential way of studying culture, especially culture as it is practiced and understood within institutional and organizational settings. We contend that, in the spirit of Carolyn Ellis' (1997) work on introspective and retrospective forays into the self, the study of organizations and culture can be significantly enhanced by the inclusion of work conducted and located within the autoethnographic genre.",
author = "Kenneth Parry and Maree Boyle",
year = "2009",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781412931182",
pages = "690--702",
editor = "D Buchanan and A Bryman",
booktitle = "The Sage handbook of organisational research methods",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
address = "United Kingdom",
edition = "1",

}

Parry, K & Boyle, M 2009, Organizational autoethnography. in D Buchanan & A Bryman (eds), The Sage handbook of organisational research methods. 1 edn, SAGE Publications Ltd, London, pp. 690-702.

Organizational autoethnography. / Parry, Kenneth; Boyle, Maree.

The Sage handbook of organisational research methods. ed. / D Buchanan; A Bryman. 1. ed. London : SAGE Publications Ltd, 2009. p. 690-702.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

TY - CHAP

T1 - Organizational autoethnography

AU - Parry, Kenneth

AU - Boyle, Maree

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - Our aim for this chapter is to begin a long and hopefully fruitful conversation about how and why autoethnography can help make valuable contributions to organizational studies. We contend that the prime role of an organizational autoethnographic study is to illuminate the relationship between the individual and the organization. Indeed, the ethnographic process has always been an essential way of studying culture, especially culture as it is practiced and understood within institutional and organizational settings. We contend that, in the spirit of Carolyn Ellis' (1997) work on introspective and retrospective forays into the self, the study of organizations and culture can be significantly enhanced by the inclusion of work conducted and located within the autoethnographic genre.

AB - Our aim for this chapter is to begin a long and hopefully fruitful conversation about how and why autoethnography can help make valuable contributions to organizational studies. We contend that the prime role of an organizational autoethnographic study is to illuminate the relationship between the individual and the organization. Indeed, the ethnographic process has always been an essential way of studying culture, especially culture as it is practiced and understood within institutional and organizational settings. We contend that, in the spirit of Carolyn Ellis' (1997) work on introspective and retrospective forays into the self, the study of organizations and culture can be significantly enhanced by the inclusion of work conducted and located within the autoethnographic genre.

UR - https://au.sagepub.com/en-gb/oce/the-sage-handbook-of-organizational-research-methods/book230566

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781412931182

SP - 690

EP - 702

BT - The Sage handbook of organisational research methods

A2 - Buchanan, D

A2 - Bryman, A

PB - SAGE Publications Ltd

CY - London

ER -

Parry K, Boyle M. Organizational autoethnography. In Buchanan D, Bryman A, editors, The Sage handbook of organisational research methods. 1 ed. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 2009. p. 690-702