On the relationship between the breadth of preferential trading arrangements and trade flows

Rod Falvey, Neil Foster-McGregor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper uses matching econometrics to extend the literature investigating the impact of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs) on goods trade flows. Heterogeneity in PTAs is accounted for through a “provision count index” derived from data provided in a recent World Bank study. PTA formation now involves two separate, sequential decisions—first, whether two trading partners should form a PTA, and second, if they do, how broad that agreement should be. We find our explanatory variables are significant for both decisions, but often have opposing effects on each. Using matched PTA and non-PTA groups of country pairs, we estimate a dose–response function which indicates that arrangements with few provisions and arrangements with many provisions do not appear to have a significant impact on goods trade flows between their members. PTAs in an intermediate range are shown to have a significant positive effect. We then relate these outcomes to the actual content of the PTAs using the concept of “provision intensity.”.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1088-1110
Number of pages23
JournalWorld Economy
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

World Bank
econometrics
Trade flows
literature

Cite this

Falvey, Rod ; Foster-McGregor, Neil. / On the relationship between the breadth of preferential trading arrangements and trade flows. In: World Economy. 2018 ; Vol. 41, No. 4. pp. 1088-1110.
@article{67ac989ae86c4d8ebe3218c87cee377a,
title = "On the relationship between the breadth of preferential trading arrangements and trade flows",
abstract = "This paper uses matching econometrics to extend the literature investigating the impact of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs) on goods trade flows. Heterogeneity in PTAs is accounted for through a “provision count index” derived from data provided in a recent World Bank study. PTA formation now involves two separate, sequential decisions—first, whether two trading partners should form a PTA, and second, if they do, how broad that agreement should be. We find our explanatory variables are significant for both decisions, but often have opposing effects on each. Using matched PTA and non-PTA groups of country pairs, we estimate a dose–response function which indicates that arrangements with few provisions and arrangements with many provisions do not appear to have a significant impact on goods trade flows between their members. PTAs in an intermediate range are shown to have a significant positive effect. We then relate these outcomes to the actual content of the PTAs using the concept of “provision intensity.”.",
author = "Rod Falvey and Neil Foster-McGregor",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/twec.12618",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1088--1110",
journal = "World Economy",
issn = "0309-1961",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

On the relationship between the breadth of preferential trading arrangements and trade flows. / Falvey, Rod; Foster-McGregor, Neil.

In: World Economy, Vol. 41, No. 4, 01.04.2018, p. 1088-1110.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the relationship between the breadth of preferential trading arrangements and trade flows

AU - Falvey, Rod

AU - Foster-McGregor, Neil

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - This paper uses matching econometrics to extend the literature investigating the impact of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs) on goods trade flows. Heterogeneity in PTAs is accounted for through a “provision count index” derived from data provided in a recent World Bank study. PTA formation now involves two separate, sequential decisions—first, whether two trading partners should form a PTA, and second, if they do, how broad that agreement should be. We find our explanatory variables are significant for both decisions, but often have opposing effects on each. Using matched PTA and non-PTA groups of country pairs, we estimate a dose–response function which indicates that arrangements with few provisions and arrangements with many provisions do not appear to have a significant impact on goods trade flows between their members. PTAs in an intermediate range are shown to have a significant positive effect. We then relate these outcomes to the actual content of the PTAs using the concept of “provision intensity.”.

AB - This paper uses matching econometrics to extend the literature investigating the impact of preferential trading arrangements (PTAs) on goods trade flows. Heterogeneity in PTAs is accounted for through a “provision count index” derived from data provided in a recent World Bank study. PTA formation now involves two separate, sequential decisions—first, whether two trading partners should form a PTA, and second, if they do, how broad that agreement should be. We find our explanatory variables are significant for both decisions, but often have opposing effects on each. Using matched PTA and non-PTA groups of country pairs, we estimate a dose–response function which indicates that arrangements with few provisions and arrangements with many provisions do not appear to have a significant impact on goods trade flows between their members. PTAs in an intermediate range are shown to have a significant positive effect. We then relate these outcomes to the actual content of the PTAs using the concept of “provision intensity.”.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041644603&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/twec.12618

DO - 10.1111/twec.12618

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 1088

EP - 1110

JO - World Economy

JF - World Economy

SN - 0309-1961

IS - 4

ER -