Obtaining informed consent: a legal perspective

Violetta Zotti, Mario G T Zotti, Lyell McEwin, David Worswick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

Abstract

Consent to treatment is a fundamental
legal and ethical obligation that
reflects patient autonomy and involves
four issues: voluntariness, information,
competence to consent, and requirements
that the person conducting the treatment
obtains the consent. This article explores
the provision of information to the patient,
the “informed” part of the consent process
and employs a clinical study to help analyse
issues surrounding the legal requirement
to warn of “material risks”. While most
legal practitioners may have a reasonable
sense of the rules of consent, this surveys
a group of clinicians administering steroid
injections. This article demonstrates how
consent rules, particularly those involving
the provision of information to patients,
are understood by clinicians, and the
relative practical difficulties created in
complying with them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-24
Number of pages3
JournalLaw Society of South Australia Bulletin
Volume34
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

voluntariness
obligation
autonomy
human being
Group

Cite this

Zotti, Violetta ; Zotti, Mario G T ; McEwin, Lyell ; Worswick, David . / Obtaining informed consent: a legal perspective. In: Law Society of South Australia Bulletin. 2012 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 22-24.
@article{2781110fb1934c7eb337064a7cd110d9,
title = "Obtaining informed consent: a legal perspective",
abstract = "Consent to treatment is a fundamentallegal and ethical obligation thatreflects patient autonomy and involvesfour issues: voluntariness, information,competence to consent, and requirementsthat the person conducting the treatmentobtains the consent. This article exploresthe provision of information to the patient,the “informed” part of the consent processand employs a clinical study to help analyseissues surrounding the legal requirementto warn of “material risks”. While mostlegal practitioners may have a reasonablesense of the rules of consent, this surveysa group of clinicians administering steroidinjections. This article demonstrates howconsent rules, particularly those involvingthe provision of information to patients,are understood by clinicians, and therelative practical difficulties created incomplying with them.",
author = "Violetta Zotti and Zotti, {Mario G T} and Lyell McEwin and David Worswick",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "22--24",
journal = "Law Society of South Australia Bulletin",
issn = "1038-6777",
number = "1",

}

Zotti, V, Zotti, MGT, McEwin, L & Worswick, D 2012, 'Obtaining informed consent: a legal perspective' Law Society of South Australia Bulletin, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22-24.

Obtaining informed consent: a legal perspective. / Zotti, Violetta; Zotti, Mario G T; McEwin, Lyell; Worswick, David .

In: Law Society of South Australia Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2012, p. 22-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearch

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obtaining informed consent: a legal perspective

AU - Zotti, Violetta

AU - Zotti, Mario G T

AU - McEwin, Lyell

AU - Worswick, David

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Consent to treatment is a fundamentallegal and ethical obligation thatreflects patient autonomy and involvesfour issues: voluntariness, information,competence to consent, and requirementsthat the person conducting the treatmentobtains the consent. This article exploresthe provision of information to the patient,the “informed” part of the consent processand employs a clinical study to help analyseissues surrounding the legal requirementto warn of “material risks”. While mostlegal practitioners may have a reasonablesense of the rules of consent, this surveysa group of clinicians administering steroidinjections. This article demonstrates howconsent rules, particularly those involvingthe provision of information to patients,are understood by clinicians, and therelative practical difficulties created incomplying with them.

AB - Consent to treatment is a fundamentallegal and ethical obligation thatreflects patient autonomy and involvesfour issues: voluntariness, information,competence to consent, and requirementsthat the person conducting the treatmentobtains the consent. This article exploresthe provision of information to the patient,the “informed” part of the consent processand employs a clinical study to help analyseissues surrounding the legal requirementto warn of “material risks”. While mostlegal practitioners may have a reasonablesense of the rules of consent, this surveysa group of clinicians administering steroidinjections. This article demonstrates howconsent rules, particularly those involvingthe provision of information to patients,are understood by clinicians, and therelative practical difficulties created incomplying with them.

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 22

EP - 24

JO - Law Society of South Australia Bulletin

JF - Law Society of South Australia Bulletin

SN - 1038-6777

IS - 1

ER -