Obesity prevention advocacy in Australia: An analysis of policy impact on autonomy

Emily Haynes, Roger Hughes, Dianne P. Reidlinger

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
53 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: To explore obesity policy options recommended by stakeholders and identify their impact on individual autotomy. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A content analysis of submissions to the Australian Government's Inquiry into Obesity was conducted. Each recommendation was categorised by its impact on autonomy, according to existing frameworks. Chi-square test for independence was used to explore the association between autonomy and stakeholder support defined as frequency of recommendation. Results: The extent of support for a policy option was significantly associated with impact on autonomy (p<0.001). Options that reduce autonomy were least frequently recommended in every setting; but more likely in schools (27%) than other settings (<1%). Recommendations to provide incentives (9%) were more common than disincentives (2%) or restrictions (3%), and those that enhance autonomy were most widely recommended (46%). Conclusions: Stakeholders advocated policy options that enhance individual autonomy to a greater extent than those that diminish autonomy. Implications for public health: Targeting obesity policy options that enhance rather than diminish autonomy may be more politically acceptable across most settings, with the exception of schools where more restrictive policy options are appropriate. Re-framing options accordingly may improve leadership by government in obesity policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-305
Number of pages7
JournalAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017

Fingerprint

Policy Making
Obesity
Motivation
Chi-Square Distribution
Public Health

Cite this

@article{c705184b858447d399db65be07cbe70b,
title = "Obesity prevention advocacy in Australia: An analysis of policy impact on autonomy",
abstract = "Objective: To explore obesity policy options recommended by stakeholders and identify their impact on individual autotomy. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A content analysis of submissions to the Australian Government's Inquiry into Obesity was conducted. Each recommendation was categorised by its impact on autonomy, according to existing frameworks. Chi-square test for independence was used to explore the association between autonomy and stakeholder support defined as frequency of recommendation. Results: The extent of support for a policy option was significantly associated with impact on autonomy (p<0.001). Options that reduce autonomy were least frequently recommended in every setting; but more likely in schools (27{\%}) than other settings (<1{\%}). Recommendations to provide incentives (9{\%}) were more common than disincentives (2{\%}) or restrictions (3{\%}), and those that enhance autonomy were most widely recommended (46{\%}). Conclusions: Stakeholders advocated policy options that enhance individual autonomy to a greater extent than those that diminish autonomy. Implications for public health: Targeting obesity policy options that enhance rather than diminish autonomy may be more politically acceptable across most settings, with the exception of schools where more restrictive policy options are appropriate. Re-framing options accordingly may improve leadership by government in obesity policy.",
author = "Emily Haynes and Roger Hughes and Reidlinger, {Dianne P.}",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/1753-6405.12660",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "299--305",
journal = "Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health",
issn = "1326-0200",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Obesity prevention advocacy in Australia : An analysis of policy impact on autonomy. / Haynes, Emily; Hughes, Roger; Reidlinger, Dianne P.

In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 299-305.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obesity prevention advocacy in Australia

T2 - An analysis of policy impact on autonomy

AU - Haynes, Emily

AU - Hughes, Roger

AU - Reidlinger, Dianne P.

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - Objective: To explore obesity policy options recommended by stakeholders and identify their impact on individual autotomy. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A content analysis of submissions to the Australian Government's Inquiry into Obesity was conducted. Each recommendation was categorised by its impact on autonomy, according to existing frameworks. Chi-square test for independence was used to explore the association between autonomy and stakeholder support defined as frequency of recommendation. Results: The extent of support for a policy option was significantly associated with impact on autonomy (p<0.001). Options that reduce autonomy were least frequently recommended in every setting; but more likely in schools (27%) than other settings (<1%). Recommendations to provide incentives (9%) were more common than disincentives (2%) or restrictions (3%), and those that enhance autonomy were most widely recommended (46%). Conclusions: Stakeholders advocated policy options that enhance individual autonomy to a greater extent than those that diminish autonomy. Implications for public health: Targeting obesity policy options that enhance rather than diminish autonomy may be more politically acceptable across most settings, with the exception of schools where more restrictive policy options are appropriate. Re-framing options accordingly may improve leadership by government in obesity policy.

AB - Objective: To explore obesity policy options recommended by stakeholders and identify their impact on individual autotomy. Methods: Qualitative and quantitative methods were used. A content analysis of submissions to the Australian Government's Inquiry into Obesity was conducted. Each recommendation was categorised by its impact on autonomy, according to existing frameworks. Chi-square test for independence was used to explore the association between autonomy and stakeholder support defined as frequency of recommendation. Results: The extent of support for a policy option was significantly associated with impact on autonomy (p<0.001). Options that reduce autonomy were least frequently recommended in every setting; but more likely in schools (27%) than other settings (<1%). Recommendations to provide incentives (9%) were more common than disincentives (2%) or restrictions (3%), and those that enhance autonomy were most widely recommended (46%). Conclusions: Stakeholders advocated policy options that enhance individual autonomy to a greater extent than those that diminish autonomy. Implications for public health: Targeting obesity policy options that enhance rather than diminish autonomy may be more politically acceptable across most settings, with the exception of schools where more restrictive policy options are appropriate. Re-framing options accordingly may improve leadership by government in obesity policy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017216836&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/1753-6405.12660

DO - 10.1111/1753-6405.12660

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 299

EP - 305

JO - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

JF - Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

SN - 1326-0200

IS - 3

ER -