Nutrition interventions in patients with gynecological cancers requiring surgery

Andreas Obermair, Marko Simunovic, Liz Isenring, Monika Janda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective Including developing countries, between 20 and 88% of gynecological oncology patients may present with at least mild malnutrition at diagnosis. Significant morbidity and mortality is attributed to malnutrition. Here we reviewed randomized clinical trials of nutritional interventions used to achieve early return to oral diet, enhance recovery from surgery and reduce adverse events in gynecological cancer patients undergoing surgery. Methods Ebscohost (CINAHL + Medline + PsycINFO), Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from 2000 onwards. Potentially eligible articles were screened by two reviewers. Length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, recovery of intestinal function, quality of life (QOL), hematological and immunological parameters were outcome measures of the nutritional interventions. Results Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the review. Early clear liquid diet, semiliquid diet, regular diet or immune-enhanced enteral diets were all found to be safe as nutritional interventions. In five of the seven trials significantly better outcomes were observed in the intervention group compared to usual care for one of more of the outcomes intestinal recovery time, LOS, postoperative complications and immunological parameters. However, the nutritional interventions varied greatly between the trials, making it difficult to directly compare their findings. Trial quality was low to moderate. Recommended malnutrition screening and assessment tools and guidelines for treatment are reviewed. Conclusions From the limited findings it would appear that nutritional interventions of early oral feeding and enteral feeding are safe. Receiving nutritional interventions seems to reduce LOS, intestinal recovery time and postoperative complications for some patients. Increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment may reduce the prevalence of patients presenting malnourished for surgery in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)192-199
Number of pages8
JournalGynecologic Oncology
Volume145
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Length of Stay
Diet
Malnutrition
Neoplasms
Randomized Controlled Trials
Neoadjuvant Therapy
Recovery of Function
Enteral Nutrition
PubMed
Developing Countries
Small Intestine
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Guidelines
Morbidity
Mortality
Therapeutics

Cite this

Obermair, Andreas ; Simunovic, Marko ; Isenring, Liz ; Janda, Monika. / Nutrition interventions in patients with gynecological cancers requiring surgery. In: Gynecologic Oncology. 2017 ; Vol. 145, No. 1. pp. 192-199.
@article{5b7581bcb239457eab1dda19afb4d49a,
title = "Nutrition interventions in patients with gynecological cancers requiring surgery",
abstract = "Objective Including developing countries, between 20 and 88{\%} of gynecological oncology patients may present with at least mild malnutrition at diagnosis. Significant morbidity and mortality is attributed to malnutrition. Here we reviewed randomized clinical trials of nutritional interventions used to achieve early return to oral diet, enhance recovery from surgery and reduce adverse events in gynecological cancer patients undergoing surgery. Methods Ebscohost (CINAHL + Medline + PsycINFO), Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from 2000 onwards. Potentially eligible articles were screened by two reviewers. Length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, recovery of intestinal function, quality of life (QOL), hematological and immunological parameters were outcome measures of the nutritional interventions. Results Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the review. Early clear liquid diet, semiliquid diet, regular diet or immune-enhanced enteral diets were all found to be safe as nutritional interventions. In five of the seven trials significantly better outcomes were observed in the intervention group compared to usual care for one of more of the outcomes intestinal recovery time, LOS, postoperative complications and immunological parameters. However, the nutritional interventions varied greatly between the trials, making it difficult to directly compare their findings. Trial quality was low to moderate. Recommended malnutrition screening and assessment tools and guidelines for treatment are reviewed. Conclusions From the limited findings it would appear that nutritional interventions of early oral feeding and enteral feeding are safe. Receiving nutritional interventions seems to reduce LOS, intestinal recovery time and postoperative complications for some patients. Increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment may reduce the prevalence of patients presenting malnourished for surgery in the future.",
author = "Andreas Obermair and Marko Simunovic and Liz Isenring and Monika Janda",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.028",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
pages = "192--199",
journal = "Gynecologic Oncology",
issn = "0090-8258",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Nutrition interventions in patients with gynecological cancers requiring surgery. / Obermair, Andreas; Simunovic, Marko; Isenring, Liz; Janda, Monika.

In: Gynecologic Oncology, Vol. 145, No. 1, 01.04.2017, p. 192-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nutrition interventions in patients with gynecological cancers requiring surgery

AU - Obermair, Andreas

AU - Simunovic, Marko

AU - Isenring, Liz

AU - Janda, Monika

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Objective Including developing countries, between 20 and 88% of gynecological oncology patients may present with at least mild malnutrition at diagnosis. Significant morbidity and mortality is attributed to malnutrition. Here we reviewed randomized clinical trials of nutritional interventions used to achieve early return to oral diet, enhance recovery from surgery and reduce adverse events in gynecological cancer patients undergoing surgery. Methods Ebscohost (CINAHL + Medline + PsycINFO), Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from 2000 onwards. Potentially eligible articles were screened by two reviewers. Length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, recovery of intestinal function, quality of life (QOL), hematological and immunological parameters were outcome measures of the nutritional interventions. Results Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the review. Early clear liquid diet, semiliquid diet, regular diet or immune-enhanced enteral diets were all found to be safe as nutritional interventions. In five of the seven trials significantly better outcomes were observed in the intervention group compared to usual care for one of more of the outcomes intestinal recovery time, LOS, postoperative complications and immunological parameters. However, the nutritional interventions varied greatly between the trials, making it difficult to directly compare their findings. Trial quality was low to moderate. Recommended malnutrition screening and assessment tools and guidelines for treatment are reviewed. Conclusions From the limited findings it would appear that nutritional interventions of early oral feeding and enteral feeding are safe. Receiving nutritional interventions seems to reduce LOS, intestinal recovery time and postoperative complications for some patients. Increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment may reduce the prevalence of patients presenting malnourished for surgery in the future.

AB - Objective Including developing countries, between 20 and 88% of gynecological oncology patients may present with at least mild malnutrition at diagnosis. Significant morbidity and mortality is attributed to malnutrition. Here we reviewed randomized clinical trials of nutritional interventions used to achieve early return to oral diet, enhance recovery from surgery and reduce adverse events in gynecological cancer patients undergoing surgery. Methods Ebscohost (CINAHL + Medline + PsycINFO), Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from 2000 onwards. Potentially eligible articles were screened by two reviewers. Length of hospital stay (LOS), postoperative complications, recovery of intestinal function, quality of life (QOL), hematological and immunological parameters were outcome measures of the nutritional interventions. Results Seven randomized clinical trials were included in the review. Early clear liquid diet, semiliquid diet, regular diet or immune-enhanced enteral diets were all found to be safe as nutritional interventions. In five of the seven trials significantly better outcomes were observed in the intervention group compared to usual care for one of more of the outcomes intestinal recovery time, LOS, postoperative complications and immunological parameters. However, the nutritional interventions varied greatly between the trials, making it difficult to directly compare their findings. Trial quality was low to moderate. Recommended malnutrition screening and assessment tools and guidelines for treatment are reviewed. Conclusions From the limited findings it would appear that nutritional interventions of early oral feeding and enteral feeding are safe. Receiving nutritional interventions seems to reduce LOS, intestinal recovery time and postoperative complications for some patients. Increasing use of neoadjuvant treatment may reduce the prevalence of patients presenting malnourished for surgery in the future.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85011340705&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.028

DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.028

M3 - Article

VL - 145

SP - 192

EP - 199

JO - Gynecologic Oncology

JF - Gynecologic Oncology

SN - 0090-8258

IS - 1

ER -