TY - JOUR
T1 - Nurse practitioner administered point-of-care ultrasound compared with X-ray for children with clinically non-angulated distal forearm fractures in the ED: A diagnostic study
AU - Snelling, Peter J.
AU - Jones, Philip
AU - Keijzers, Gerben
AU - Bade, David
AU - Herd, David W.
AU - Ware, Robert S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding The study was funded by the Study, Education and Research Trust Account (SERTA) Research Grant, Round 2, 2017, Children’s Health Queensland, Australia. The funding body had no role in the conduct or reporting of the research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/2/1
Y1 - 2021/2/1
N2 - Background: Paediatric distal forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. They can be diagnosed with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative to X-rays. Given that ED nurse practitioners (NPs) are relied on for the diagnosis of paediatric fractures, it is important to describe the diagnostic accuracy of NP-conducted POCUS versus X-ray. Methods: This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary paediatric hospital in Queensland, Australia, between February 2018 and April 2019. Participants were children aged 4-16 years with a clinically non-angulated, suspected distal forearm fracture. Diagnosis from 6-view NP-administered POCUS of the distal radius and ulna was compared against the reference standard of 2-view X-ray. Each patient received both imaging modalities. Overall forearm diagnosis was classified as no', buckle' or other' fracture for both modalities. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for any' fracture (buckle' and other' fractures combined). Secondary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy for other' fractures versus buckle' and no' fractures combined, and pain, imaging duration and preference for modality. Results: Of 204 recruited patients, 129 had X-ray-diagnosed forearm fractures. The sensitivity and specificity for NP-administered POCUS were 94.6% (95% CI 89.2% to 97.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI 75.6% to 91.6%), respectively. Other' fractures (mostly cortical breach fractures), when compared with buckle'/no' fractures, had sensitivity 81.0% (95% CI 69.1% to 89.1%) and specificity 95.9% (95% CI 91.3% to 98.1%). Pain and imaging duration were clinically similar between modalities. There was a preference for POCUS by patients, parents and NPs. Conclusions: NP-administered POCUS had clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for paediatric patients presenting with non-angulated distal forearm injuries. This included good sensitivity for diagnosis of any' fracture and good specificity for diagnosis of cortical breach fractures alone. Given the preference for POCUS, and the lack of difference in pain and duration between modalities, future research should consider functional outcomes comparing POCUS with X-ray in this population in a randomised controlled trial.
AB - Background: Paediatric distal forearm fractures are a common ED presentation. They can be diagnosed with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative to X-rays. Given that ED nurse practitioners (NPs) are relied on for the diagnosis of paediatric fractures, it is important to describe the diagnostic accuracy of NP-conducted POCUS versus X-ray. Methods: This prospective diagnostic study was conducted in a tertiary paediatric hospital in Queensland, Australia, between February 2018 and April 2019. Participants were children aged 4-16 years with a clinically non-angulated, suspected distal forearm fracture. Diagnosis from 6-view NP-administered POCUS of the distal radius and ulna was compared against the reference standard of 2-view X-ray. Each patient received both imaging modalities. Overall forearm diagnosis was classified as no', buckle' or other' fracture for both modalities. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for any' fracture (buckle' and other' fractures combined). Secondary outcomes included diagnostic accuracy for other' fractures versus buckle' and no' fractures combined, and pain, imaging duration and preference for modality. Results: Of 204 recruited patients, 129 had X-ray-diagnosed forearm fractures. The sensitivity and specificity for NP-administered POCUS were 94.6% (95% CI 89.2% to 97.3%) and 85.3% (95% CI 75.6% to 91.6%), respectively. Other' fractures (mostly cortical breach fractures), when compared with buckle'/no' fractures, had sensitivity 81.0% (95% CI 69.1% to 89.1%) and specificity 95.9% (95% CI 91.3% to 98.1%). Pain and imaging duration were clinically similar between modalities. There was a preference for POCUS by patients, parents and NPs. Conclusions: NP-administered POCUS had clinically acceptable diagnostic accuracy for paediatric patients presenting with non-angulated distal forearm injuries. This included good sensitivity for diagnosis of any' fracture and good specificity for diagnosis of cortical breach fractures alone. Given the preference for POCUS, and the lack of difference in pain and duration between modalities, future research should consider functional outcomes comparing POCUS with X-ray in this population in a randomised controlled trial.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098166004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/emermed-2020-209689
DO - 10.1136/emermed-2020-209689
M3 - Article
C2 - 32900856
AN - SCOPUS:85098166004
SN - 1472-0205
VL - 38
SP - 139
EP - 145
JO - Emergency Medicine Journal
JF - Emergency Medicine Journal
IS - 2
ER -